Single, Direct Detection Of Hemoglobin A1C Percentage Using Enzyme Triggered Redox Altering Chemical Elimination (E-Trace) Immunoassay

ABSTRACT

The disclosure also relates to novel compositions and methods for the single, direct detection of Hemoglobin A1c percentage in a sample, using conversion of functional groups attached to a transitional metal complex, resulting in quantifiable electrochemical signal at two unique potentials, E o   1  and E o   2 .

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/547,824, filed on Oct. 17, 2011, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/354,200, filed Jan. 19, 2012 which in turn claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional application No. 61/434,122, filed Jan. 19, 2011 and U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/523,679, filed Aug. 15, 2011 and is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/853,204, filed Aug. 9, 2010, which claims priority to U.S. provisional application No. 61/232,339, filed Aug. 7, 2009, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to novel compositions and methods for the detection of target analytes using change in E⁰ of a transitional metal complex. The invention also relates to novel compositions and methods for the detection of Hemoglobin A1c using conversion of functional groups attached to a transitional metal complex, resulting in quantifiable electrochemical signal at two unique potentials, E^(o) ₁ and E^(o) ₂.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The electromotive force (EMF) is the maximum potential difference between two electrodes of a galvanic or voltaic cell, where the standard hydrogen electrode is on the left-hand side for the following cell:

1 2 Pt Electrode H₂ Aqueous Electrolyte 10⁻³ M Fe(ClO₄)₃ Pt Solution 10⁻³ M Fe(ClO₄)₂ The EMF is called the electrode potential of the electrode placed on the right-hand side in the graphical scheme of the cell, but only when the liquid junction between the solutions can be neglected or calculated, or if it does not exist at all.

The electrode potential of the electrode on the right-hand side (often called the oxidation-reduction potential) is given by the Nernst equation

E _(Fe) ₃₊ _(/Fe) ₂₊ =E _(Fe) ₃₊ _(/Fe) ₂₊ ⁰+(RT/F)ln(a _(Fe) ₃₊ /a _(Fe) ₂₊ )

This relationship follows from equation (2.21) when (μ_(Fe) ³⁻ ⁰−μ_(Fe) ₂₊ ⁰)/F is set equal to E_(Fe) ₃₊ _(/Fe) ₂₊ ⁰ and the pH and ln p_(H) ₂ are equal to zero. In the subscript of the symbol for the electrode potential the symbols for the oxidized and reduced components of the oxidation-reduction system are indicated. With more complex reactions it is particularly recommended to write the whole reaction that takes place in the right-hand half of the cell after symbol E (the ‘half-cell’ reaction); thus, in the present case

E _(Fe) ₃₊ _(/Fe) ₂₊ ≡E(Fe ³⁺ +e=Fe ²⁺)

Quantity E_(Fe) ₃₊ _(/Fe) ₂₊ ⁰ is termed the standard electrode potential. It characterizes the oxidizing or reducing ability of the component of oxidation-reduction systems. With more positive standard electrode potentials, the oxidized form of the system is a stronger oxidant and the reduced form is a weaker reductant. Similarly, with a more negative standard potential, the reduced component of the oxidation-reduction system is a stronger reductant and the oxidized form a weaker oxidant.

The standard electrode E⁰, in its standard usage in the Nernst equation, equation (1-2) is described as:

$E = {E^{0} + {\frac{2.3\; {RT}}{nF}\log \frac{C_{0}\left( {0,t} \right)}{C_{R}\left( {0,t} \right)}}}$

Where E⁰ is the standard potential for the redox reaction, R is the universal gas constant (8.314 JK⁻¹mol⁻¹), T is the Kelvin temperature, n is the number of electrons transferred in the reaction, and F is the Faraday constant (96,487 coulombs). On the negative side of E⁰, the oxidized form thus tends to be reduced, and the forward reaction (i.e., reduction) is more favorable. The current resulting from a change in oxidation state of the electroactive species is termed the faradaic

Previous work describes using conversion of functional groups attached to a transitional metal complex resulting in quantifiable electrochemical signal at two unique potentials, E^(o) ₁ and E^(o) ₂. See for example, U.S. Pat. No. 11-1005-US11-1005-US2, all herein incorporated by reference in their entirety. The methods generally comprise binding an analyte within a sandwich of binding ligands which may have a functional tag, on a solid support other than the electrode. After target binding, a peroxide generating moiety or an intermediary enzyme and substrate are added, which generates hydrogen peroxide. The redox active complex is bound to an electrode and comprises a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM). The peroxide generated from the enzyme system reacts with the PSM, removing a self-immolative moiety (SIM) and converting functional groups attached to a transitional metal complex resulting in quantifiable electrochemical signal at two unique potentials, E^(o) ₁ and E^(o) ₂.

Patients afflicted with diabetes are incapable of metabolizing glucose in a conventional manner resulting in a build-up of glucose in their blood and urine. Conventionally, the glucose level in such body fluids is taken as a measure of the state of the diabetic condition which, in turn, is used as a guide for the amount of insulin or other agent to be taken or of the need to change the patient's diet. This works moderately well except that the glucose level may fluctuate widely in dependence upon the time and content of the last meal, the last insulin injection, and the like. Thus, the reading will reflect an instantaneous condition which might not truly identify the longer term state of the diabetic condition. To circumvent the single glucose determination, more elaborate measurements (e.g., the 4 to 8 hour glucose tolerance tests) are used to measure the blood levels of glucose following an oral administration. These latter tests are time consuming, expensive and the individual must fast during the course of the assay. It is known that another effect of the diabetic condition is an increase in the amount of glycated hemoglobin (Hb) in the blood of the diabetic. The glycation of hemoglobin occurs by a non-enzymatic reaction involving glucose and the alpha-amino group of valine. The glycation reaction is governed by the concentration of the reactants, e.g., hemoglobin and glucose. In a normal (non-diabetic) individual approximately 3% of the total hemoglobin is glycated. Hemoglobin tetramers with a 1-deoxyfructo-valine on the N-terminus of a beta-chain are identified as being glycated or A1c hemoglobin. With hemoglobin, the A1c level is raised 5 to 12%. Since the circulating life span of hemoglobin is about 120 days, a glycated hemoglobin measurement will give a value which reflects an average glucose level for that period. Notably a meal high in glucose will not be reflected in a high glycated hemoglobin or serum albumin level. Thus, measurement of the glycated hemoglobin content gives a truer picture of the average circulating glucose levels and thus a truer picture of the long term condition of the patient. It's been reported that a 1% change in glycated Hb (% HbA1c) represents an average change of 300 mg/L in blood glucose levels over the preceding 120 days.

There are many literature and patent references that describe the measurement of A1C % utilizing antibodies to perform two separate measurements, one for the concentration of glycated hemoglobin the other for the concentration of total hemoglobin. The A1C % is calculated as a ratio of [Hemoglobin A1c]/[Hemoglobin]. Examples include U.S. Pat. No. 4,727,036, U.S. Pat. No. 4,247,533, U.S. Pat. No. 5,206,144, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,806,468. These patents describe the difficulty and imprecision of performing two separate assays for two different analytes and then calculating the A1C % as a ratio of [Hemoglobin A1c]/[Hemoglobin]. Using this method, the effect of measurement error is amplified, thereby increasing imprecision in reported A1C %.

Additionally, U.S. Pat. No. 5,407,759 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,162,645 imply that their methods are based on a single measurement A1C % detection. These methods, however, either use the term “single measurement” in a confusing manner, or do not describe an approach that can be applied universally for accurate measurement of clinical samples. In particular, neither the claims nor the detailed description within these patents clearly present how their “single measurement” approach can be accurately applied when the concentration of total hemoglobin varies significantly between samples. The physiological range of hemoglobin concentration ranges from 5 g/dL to 20 g/dL, a four-fold difference.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention discussed herein is a true single measurement approach that can be utilized universally across samples to measure A1C % regardless of physiological total hemoglobin concentration, producing an accurate determination of hemoglobin A1C %. The advantages of a single measurement approach that directly detects the ratio of hemoglobin A1C to the total hemoglobin are described below. As defined herein, the term “single measurement” and “single direct measurement” means a single measurement of the ratio of glycated protein (e.g., hemoglobin A1C) to total protein (e.g., total hemoglobin) that does not involve the performance of two separate measurements, one for concentration of glycated protein (e.g. hemoglobin A1C) and one for the concentration of total protein (e.g., total hemoglobin).

Thus, the present invention provides composition and methods for the detection of target analytes using the solvent reorganization energy, the corresponding in E⁰ of redox active molecules.

The present invention also provides composition and methods for the detection of target analytes using the conversion of functional groups attached to a transitional metal complex resulting in quantifiable electrochemical signal at two unique potentials, E^(o) ₁ and E^(o) ₂.

In one aspect, the invention provides compositions and methods for the detection of target analyte in a test sample. Thus, the invention provides a first solid support comprising an electrode comprising: an optional self-assembled monolayer (SAM). (ii) a covalently attached electroactive active moiety (EAM) comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety (SIM) and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM), wherein said EAM has a first E⁰ and a self-assembled monolayer (SAM). The capture binding ligand that binds the analyte, is on a second solid support other than the electrode.

The invention described herein is generally a method for the determination of glycated proteins as a fraction of the total protein. The methods are exemplified by a particular embodiment, the single-measurement detection of the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin. However, the exemplified method can be expanded to apply to a wide range of glycated serum proteins (e.g., Fructosamine) or glycated albumin, all three used as possible diabetic markers. It can, however, be also expanded to include all other possible glycated proteins, such as, albumins, immunoglobulins, lipoproteins, fibrinogens, regulatory proteins and clotting factors. In more detail these proteins could include, alpha2-macroglobulin, other globulins, which are of three types—alpha, beta and gamma, alpha anti-trypsins Transferrin, Prothrombin, MBL or MBP, Prealbuminm Alpha 1 antitrypsin, Alpha 1 acid glycoprotein, Alpha 1 fetoprotein, Haptoglobin, Alpha 2 macroglobulin, Ceruloplasmin, Transferring C3/C4 Beta 2 microglobulin, Beta lipoprotein, Gamma globulin proteins, C-reactive protein (CRP).

In one embodiment, the methods proceed by contacting the target analyte and the second solid support comprising the capture binding ligand, under conditions wherein the target analyte binds the capture binding ligand to form a first complex, and contacting the first complex with a soluble tagged binding ligand that binds the target analyte to form a second complex, wherein the soluble, tagged binding ligand comprises a peroxide generating moiety. A substrate is added to the second complex under conditions that peroxide is generated to form an assay mixture. The peroxide containing assay mixture then contacts said first solid support comprising an electrode comprising a covalently attached electroactive active moiety (EAM) having a first E⁰, said EAM comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety (SIM) and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM). Said peroxide reacts with said PSM, thereby triggering removal of said SIM from said EAM to form a second EAM that has a second E⁰ different from said first E⁰. The percentage of glycated hemoglobin over total hemoglobin is then measured, based on a quantifiable electrochemical signal at two unique potentials, E^(o) ₁ and E^(o) ₂.

In a preferred embodiment, the methods proceed by contacting the target analyte, under conditions wherein the target analyte binds the soluble, tagged binding ligand, wherein the soluble, tagged binding ligand comprises a peroxide generating moiety to form a first complex, and contacting the first complex with the second solid support comprising the capture binding ligand that binds the target analyte to form a second complex. A substrate is added to the second complex under conditions that peroxide is generated to form an assay mixture. The peroxide containing assay mixture then contacts said first solid support comprising an electrode comprising a covalently attached electroactive active moiety (EAM) having a first E⁰, said EAM comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety (SIM) and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM). Said peroxide reacts with said PSM, thereby triggering removal of said SIM from said EAM to form a second EAM that has a second E⁰ different from said first E⁰. The percentage of glycated hemoglobin over total hemoglobin is then measured, based on a quantifiable electrochemical signal at two unique potentials, E^(o) ₁ and E^(o) ₂.

In one embodiment, the methods proceed by contacting the target analyte and the second solid support comprising the capture binding ligand, under conditions wherein the target analyte binds the capture binding ligand to form a first complex, and contacting the first complex with a soluble, tagged binding ligand that binds the target analyte to form a second complex, wherein the soluble, tagged binding ligand comprises an intermediary enzyme component of a peroxide generating system. A substrate is added to the second complex under conditions that peroxide is generated to form an assay mixture. The peroxide containing assay mixture then contacts said first solid support comprising an electrode comprising a covalently attached electroactive active moiety (EAM) having a first E⁰, said EAM comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety (SIM) and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM). Said peroxide reacts with said PSM, thereby triggering removal of said SIM from said EAM to form a second EAM that has a second E⁰ different from said first E⁰. The percentage of glycated hemoglobin over total hemoglobin is then measured, based on a quantifiable electrochemical signal at two unique potentials, E^(o) ₁ and E^(o) ₂.

In another embodiment, the methods proceed by contacting the target analyte and under conditions wherein the target analyte binds the soluble, tagged binding ligand, wherein the soluble, tagged binding ligand comprises an intermediary enzyme component of a peroxide generating system to form a first complex, and contacting the first complex with the second solid support comprising the capture binding ligand that binds the target analyte to form a second complex. A substrate is added to the second complex under conditions that peroxide is generated to form an assay mixture. The peroxide containing assay mixture then contacts said first solid support comprising an electrode comprising a covalently attached electroactive active moiety (EAM) having a first E⁰, said EAM comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety (SIM) and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM). Said peroxide reacts with said PSM, thereby triggering removal of said SIM from said EAM to form a second EAM that has a second E⁰ different from said first E⁰. The percentage of glycated hemoglobin over total hemoglobin is then measured, based on a quantifiable electrochemical signal at two unique potentials, E^(o) ₁ and E^(o) ₂.

In certain embodiments of the methods for detecting a target analyte (i.e. glycated hemoglobin), prior to sample addition there is electroactive active moiety (EAM) having a first E⁰, said EAM comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety (SIM) and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM). Said peroxide reacts with said PSM, thereby triggering removal of said SIM from said EAM to form a second EAM that has a second E⁰ different from said first E⁰. The percentage of glycated hemoglobin over total hemoglobin is then measured, based on a quantifiable electrochemical signal at two unique potentials, E^(o) ₁ and E^(o) ₂. Various analyses and resulting ratios from these two responses at different potentials, E⁰, can be used to quantify the analyte. These ratios can include, but are not limited to, ratios of total peak current, faradaic peak current or peak charge associated with these two potentials.

In another aspect, the invention provides compositions comprising (a) a first solid support comprising an electrode comprising: (i) a self-assembled monolayer (SAM); (ii) a covalently attached electroactive active moiety (EAM) comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM), wherein said first EAM has a first E⁰; and (b) a second solid support comprising of a peroxide-generating enzyme that generates peroxide in the presence of a substrate for said peroxide-generating enzyme.

In one embodiment the reaction mechanism for representative ferrocene-based EAMs that undergo a peroxide-triggered change in apparent formal potential (E-TRACE) follow the following steps:

-   (a) starting ferrocenyl EAM that contains an electron-withdrawing     carbamate-linked boronate ester-substituted ligand. -   (b) reaction with peroxide leads to an electron-donating amino     ligand on the ferrocene which results in a distinct the redox     potential from starting species.

In one aspect, the disclosure provides a single, direct measurement method for measuring the fraction of a protein that is a glycated protein in a test sample comprising said protein and said glycated protein, said method comprising:

-   (a) contacting a first binding ligand with said test sample under     conditions wherein said first binding ligand binds selectively and     equivalently to said protein and said glycated protein in direct     proportion to the fraction of said glycated protein in said test     sample to form a first complex; -   (b) contacting said sample containing first complex, with a second     binding ligand under conditions wherein said first complex and said     second binding ligand bind to form a second complex, wherein said     second binding ligand comprising a peroxide-generating system and     wherein said second binding ligand binds specifically to said     glycated protein of said first complex; -   (c) isolating said second complex; -   (d) contacting said second complex with a substrate for said     peroxide-generating system under conditions wherein a peroxide is     generated to form an assay mixture; -   (e) contacting the assay mixture with a first solid support     comprising an electrode comprising a covalently attached     electroactive moiety (EAM) having a first E⁰, said EAM comprising a     transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety (SIM)     and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM), wherein said peroxide reacts     with said PSM to release said SIM from said EAM and result in said     EAM having a second E⁰; -   (f) measuring the electrochemical properties of said EAM at the     first E⁰ and at the second E⁰; and -   (g) determining the fraction of said glycated protein from said     electrochemical properties.     As used herein, the term “direct proportion to the fraction of said     glycated protein” means the fraction of the glycated protein (e.g.,     Hemoglobin A1C) relative to the total protein (e.g., total     Hemoglobin).

In another aspect, the disclosure provides a single, direct measurement method for measuring the fraction of a protein that is a glycated protein in a test sample comprising said protein and said glycated protein, said method comprising:

-   (a) contacting a first binding ligand comprising a     peroxide-generating system with a test sample under conditions     wherein first binding ligand binds specifically to said glycated     protein to form a first complex; -   (b) contacting said sample containing first complex, with a second     binding ligand under conditions wherein said second binding ligand     binds selectively and equivalently to said protein and said glycated     protein of said first complex in direct proportion to the fraction     of said glycated protein in said test sample to form a second     complex; -   (c) isolating said second complex; -   (d) contacting said second complex with a substrate for said     peroxide-generating system under conditions wherein a peroxide is     generated to form an assay mixture; -   (e) contacting the assay mixture with a first solid support     comprising an electrode comprising a covalently attached     electroactive moiety (EAM) having a first E⁰, said EAM comprising a     transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety (SIM)     and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM), wherein said peroxide reacts     with said PSM to release said SIM from said EAM and result in said     EAM having a second E⁰; -   (f) measuring the electrochemical properties of said EAM at the     first E⁰ and at the second E⁰; and -   (g) determining the fraction of said glycated protein from said     electrochemical properties.

In certain embodiments, the methods as described above are those wherein the electrode further comprises a self-assembled monolayer (SAM).

In certain embodiments, the methods as described above are those wherein the first binding ligand is attached to a second solid support.

In certain embodiments, the methods as described above are those wherein the second binding ligand is attached to a second solid support.

In other embodiments, the methods as described above are those wherein the second solid support is chosen from the group consisting of microparticles, magnetic microparticles, beads, and microchannels.

In other embodiments, the methods as described above are those wherein the peroxide-generating system is an oxidase enzyme.

In certain embodiments, the methods as described above are those wherein the peroxide-generating enzyme is selected from the group consisting of glucose oxidase, glucose oxidase, acyl CoA oxidases, alcohol oxidases, aldehyde oxidases, D-amino acid oxidase (DAAO), choline oxidase, and acyl CoA oxidases.

In other embodiments, the methods as described above are those wherein the peroxide-generating system is an intermediary enzyme component of a peroxide generating system, such as alkaline phosphatase or any other phosphatase.

In other embodiments, the methods as described above are those wherein the first binding ligand and the second binding ligand are independently chosen from the group consisting of monoclonal antibodies, fragments of monoclonal antibodies, polyclonal antibodies, fragments of polyclonal antibodies, proteins, and peptides.

In certain embodiments, the methods as described above are those wherein the EAM comprises a transition metal. In other embodiment, the transition metal is chosen from the group consisting of iron, ruthenium and osmium. In another embodiment, the EAM is chosen from the group consisting of ferrocene and substituted ferrocene.

In other embodiments, the methods as described above are those where the protein is hemoglobin and the glycated protein is glycated hemoglobin. In another embodiment, the protein is hemoglobin and the glycated protein is hemoglobin A1c. In yet another embodiment, the glycated protein is glycated serum protein, fructosamine and glycated albumin.

In one aspect, the disclosure provides a composition comprising:

-   (a) a first solid support comprising     -   (i) a covalently attached electroactive active moiety (EAM)         comprising a transition metal complex comprising a         self-immolative moiety (SIM) and a peroxide sensitive moiety         (PSM), wherein said EAM has a first E⁰ when said SIM is         covalently attached to said EAM and a second E⁰ when said SIM is         absent;     -   (ii) optional self-assembled monolayer (SAM); -   (b) a first binding ligand that binds selectively and equivalently     to a protein and a glycated protein in direct proportion to the     fraction of glycated protein in a test sample; -   (c) a second binding ligand that specifically binds to said glycated     protein, said second binding ligand comprising a peroxide-generating     system and optionally bound to a second solid support; and -   (d) optional substrate for said peroxide-generating system.

In one aspect, the invention provides compositions and methods for the detection of target analytes in a test sample. Thus, the invention provides a solid support comprising an electrode comprising: a self-assembled monolayer (SAM). (ii) a covalently attached electroactive active moiety (EAM) comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety (SIM) and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM), wherein said EAM has a first E⁰ and a capture binding ligand that binds the analyte, and a self-assembled monolayer (SAM).

The methods proceed by contacting the target analyte and the solid support, under conditions wherein the target analyte binds the capture binding ligand to form a first complex, and contacting the first complex with a soluble capture ligand that binds the target analyte, wherein the soluble capture ligand comprises a peroxide generating moiety to form a second complex. A peroxide substrate is added to the second complex under conditions that peroxide is generated and the self-immolative moiety is removed such that the EAM has a second E⁰. The second E⁰ is then detected as an indication of the presence of said target.

In another aspect, the invention provides methods for detecting a target analyte in a test sample, said method comprising: (a) providing a solid support comprising an electrode comprising: (i) a self-assembled monolayer (SAM); (ii) a covalently attached electroactive active moiety (EAM) comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM), wherein said EAM has a first E⁰, (iii) a peroxide generating enzyme that generates peroxide in the presence of said target analyte; (b) contacting said target analyte and said solid support, under conditions wherein said target analyte reacts with said enzyme to generate peroxide and said self-immolative moiety is removed such that said EAM has a second E⁰; and (c) detecting said second E⁰ as an indication of the presence of said target analyte.

In another aspect, the invention provides a method for detecting a target analyte in a test sample, said method comprising: (a) providing a solid support comprising an electrode comprising: (i) a self-assembled monolayer (SAM); (ii) a covalently attached electroactive active moiety (EAM) comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM), wherein said EAM has a first E⁰; (b) contacting said target analyte and said solid support in the presence of an enzyme and optionally an additional substrate for said enzyme, under conditions wherein if said analyte is present a first complex is formed; (c) contacting said first complex with a peroxide generating enzyme under conditions wherein if said first complex is formed, said enzyme is attached to said electrode; (d) providing a substrate for said enzyme such that peroxide is generated and said self-immolative moiety is removed such that said EAM has a second E⁰; and (e) detecting said second E⁰ as an indication of the presence of said target analyte.

In another aspect, the invention provides methods for detecting a target analyte in a test sample, said method comprising: (a) providing a solid support comprising an electrode comprising: (i) a self-assembled monolayer (SAM); (ii) a covalently attached electroactive active moiety (EAM) comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM), wherein said EAM has a first E⁰; (iii) a peroxide-generating enzyme that generates peroxide in the presence of a substrate for said peroxide-generating enzyme; (b) contacting said target analyte and said solid support in the presence of an enzyme and an additional substrate for said enzyme, under conditions wherein if said analyte is present, the substrate for said peroxide-generating enzyme is formed, said peroxide is generated and said self-immolative moiety is removed such that said EAM has a second E⁰; and (c) detecting said second E⁰ as an indication of the presence of said target analyte.

In another aspect, the invention provides method for detecting a target analyte in a test sample, said method comprising: (a) providing a solid support comprising an electrode comprising: (i) a self-assembled monolayer (SAM); (ii) a covalently attached electroactive active moiety (EAM) comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM), wherein said EAM has a first E⁰; (b) contacting said target analyte and said solid support in the presence of an enzyme and an additional substrate for said enzyme, under conditions wherein if said analyte is present, a substrate for a peroxide-generating enzyme is formed; (c) contacting said substrate for a peroxide-generating enzyme with a peroxide generating enzyme under conditions wherein if said substrate for a peroxide-generating enzyme is formed, peroxide is generated and said self-immolative moiety is removed such that said EAM has a second E⁰; and (d) detecting said second E⁰ as an indication of the presence of said target analyte. In one embodiment, prior to step (b), steps (b) and (c) are done simultaneously. In certain embodiments, the solid support comprises an array of electrodes. In another embodiment, the method is wherein the target analyte is ATP. In another embodiment, the method is wherein the peroxide-generating enzyme is glycerol-3-phosphate oxidase (G3PO) and the substrate for the peroxide-generating enzyme is glycerol-3-phosphate. In yet another embodiment of the method, the enzyme is glycerol kinase (GK) and the additional substrate for said enzyme is glycerol.

In another aspect, the invention provides composition comprising a solid support comprising: (a) an electrode comprising: (i) a self-assembled monolayer (SAM); (ii) a covalently attached electroactive active moiety (EAM) comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM), wherein said EAM has a first E⁰ when said self-immolative moiety is covalently attached to said EAM and a second E⁰ when said self-immolative moiety is absent; (iii) a peroxide-generating enzyme that generates peroxide in the presence of a substrate for said peroxide-generating enzyme; and (b) a soluble enzyme that generates said substrate for said peroxide-generating enzyme in the presence of a target analyte and an additional substrate or said soluble enzyme.

In another aspect, the invention provides composition comprising a solid support comprising: (a) an electrode comprising: (i) a self-assembled monolayer (SAM); (ii) a covalently attached electroactive active moiety (EAM) comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM), wherein said EAM has a first E⁰ when said self-immolative moiety is covalently attached to said EAM and a second E⁰ when said self-immolative moiety is absent; (b) a soluble peroxide-generating enzyme that generates peroxide in the presence of a substrate for said peroxide-generating enzyme; (c) a soluble enzyme that generates said substrate for said peroxide-generating enzyme in the presence of a target analyte and an additional substrate of said soluble enzyme.

In another aspect, the invention provides methods for detecting a target analyte (in one embodiment glycated hemoglobin) in a test sample, said method comprising: (a) providing a solid support comprising an electrode comprising: (i) a self-assembled monolayer (SAM); (ii) a covalently attached electroactive active moiety (EAM) comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM), wherein said EAM has a first E⁰, (iii) a capture binding ligand that binds said target analyte (e.g., glycated hemoglobin); (b) contacting said target analyte (e.g., glycated hemoglobin) and said solid support, under conditions wherein said target analyte (e.g., glycated hemoglobin) binds said capture binding ligand to form a first complex; (c) contacting said first complex with a soluble capture ligand that binds said target analyte (e.g., glycated hemoglobin), wherein said soluble capture ligand comprises a peroxide generating moiety to form a second complex; (d) adding a peroxide substrate to said second complex under conditions that peroxide is generated and said self-immolative moiety is removed such that said EAM has a second E⁰; and (e) detecting said second E⁰ as an indication of the presence of said target analyte (e.g., glycated hemoglobin). In one embodiment, prior to step (b), a washing step is performed. In another embodiment, prior to step (c), a washing step is performed. In yet another embodiment, steps (b) and (c) are done simultaneously. In certain embodiment, the peroxide generating moiety is a glucose oxidase enzyme. In certain embodiments, the solid support comprises an array of electrodes. In certain embodiments, the method can further comprise determining the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the sample based on said detecting of said second E⁰.

In certain embodiments of the methods for detecting a target analyte (e.g. glycated hemoglobin), in a test sample, before the analyte is added there is mainly one peak with first E⁰. Upon addition of the analyte, the first peak with first E⁰ diminishes and a second peak with second E⁰ grows. Various ratios from these two peaks at different potentials E⁰, can be used to quantify the analyte. These ratios can include, but are not limited to, ratios of total peak current, faradaic peak current or peak charge associated with these two potentials.

In another aspect, the invention provides compositions comprising a solid support comprising: (a) an electrode comprising: (i) a self-assembled monolayer (SAM); (ii) a covalently attached electroactive active moiety (EAM) comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM), wherein said EAM has a first E⁰ when said self-immolative moiety is covalently attached to said EAM and a second E⁰ when said self-immolative moiety is absent; (iii) a capture binding ligand that binds target analyte (e.g., glycated hemoglobin); and (b) a soluble capture ligand that binds said target analyte (e.g., glycated hemoglobin), wherein said soluble capture ligand comprises a peroxide generating moiety.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1. Structure of electroactive molecule (EAM) 1 and mechanism of peroxide-induced ligand dissociation. The change in ligand electronics is responsible for the shift in redox potential.

FIG. 2. The synthetic scheme of one of the embodiments of the invention as depicted in FIG. 1.

FIG. 3. Solution CV data for EAM 1 and a control compound following H₂O₂ induced cleavage of the POM ligand. The change in E0 following the self-immolative process is 331 mV. Experiments were run in THF with TBAClO₄ (150 mM) supporting electrolyte using a carbon working electrode, Ag/AgCl reference electrode, and a Pt wire counter electrode.

FIG. 4. Overlaid cyclic voltammograms from a SAM of EAM 1 before (dotted) and after solid incubation with 1 mM hydrogen peroxide in NaHCO₃ buffer (pH 8.5) for 10 min, followed by a 5-min wash in Na₂CO₃ buffer (pH 10.1; lower peaks). Supporting electrolyte was 1M LiClO₄, silver quasi reference electrode, platinum wire counter electrode. Scan rate was 10000 mV/s.

FIG. 5. Overlaid cyclic voltammograms from a SAM of EAM 1 before (dotted) and after (solid) incubation with 1 mM glucose and 100 uM glucose oxidase in NaHCO₃ buffer (pH 8.5) for 10 min, followed by a 5 min wash in Na₂CO₃ buffer (pH 10.1). Supporting electrolyte was 1M LiClO₄, silver quasi reference electrode, platinum wire counter electrode. Scan rate was 10000 mV/s.

FIG. 6. Sample self-immolative spacer groups based on substituted quinone methides.

FIG. 7. Cyclic voltamogram for SAM of EAM 1 following antibody sandwich formation with human cardiac troponin I (10 ng/mL) before (dotted) and after (solid) incubation with glucose for 10 min. inset shows the peak at −0.10V magnified.

FIG. 8. Depicts a variety of self-immolative moieties which find use in the present invention. “PSM” stands for “peroxide sensitive moiety” and “EAM” stands for “electroactive moiety”. As is shown in the figures, a variety of monomeric self-immolative moieties (sometimes referred to herein as “SIM”) can be used; Figure XA depicts a first type of self-immolative moiety, which relies on the PSM contributing an —OH group upon contact with peroxide, resulting a phenol-based linker that releases from the EAM. n can be an integer of 1 or higher, with from 1 to 5 finding particular use in the invention. m is an integer of at least one; as will be appreciated by those in the art, m will depend on the transitional metal complex used and the number of positions in the EAM; for example, when a metallocene such as ferrocene is used, there can be up to 5 PSM-SIMs per cyclopentadienyl ring, with at least one of the positions on one of the rings being used for attachment to the electrode. Figures B, C and D show multimers of SIMs. X can be —NH— or —O—.

FIG. 9. Depicts additional peroxide sensitive moieties. Figure A depicts the PSB ether (parasiletanylbenzyl) moiety and Figure B depicts the pentafluorophenylsulfonate (PFPS) moiety. As shown in Figure (next), there can be more than one self-immolative moiety per EAM and/or more than one PSM-SIM per EAM. As for the boron containing PSMs, there can be multiple PSB ethers or PFPS moieties per EAM as well.

FIG. 10. Depicts a ferrocene that has R groups. The moiety shown has the attachment linker and the self-immolative moiety and the peroxide sensitive moiety on different rings, although as described herein, they can be on the same ring. In addition, any or all of the R groups can be an additional -SIM-PSM substituent, as well as traditional substituents (alkyl (including substituted alkyl, heteroalkyl, cyclic alkyl, etc.), aryl (including substituted aryl and heteroaryl), etc.).

FIG. 11 is similar to FIG. 1 in showing the reaction mechanism for a representative ferrocene based EAM that undergoes a peroxide-triggered change in the apparent formal potential. (A) is the starting ferrocenyl EAM that contains an electron-withdrawing carbamate-linked boronate ester-substituted ligand. (B) Shows that the reaction with peroxide leads to an electron-donating amino ligand on the ferrocene which changes the redox potential) (E⁰).

FIG. 12 depicts a representative metabolite assay for the detection of NADH in a sample. In this particular embodiment, the NADH oxidase (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate-oxidase) is attached to the electrode using a biotin-streptavidin system, although as will be appreciated by those in the art, any number of additional methods can be used, including the use of the NHS or maleimide system outlined in PCT/US2008/080379, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. In this embodiment, the NADH oxidase is attached via an amine or other functional group, such as the N-terminus, using activation chemistry.

FIG. 13 depicts one embodiment of the electrochemical detection of ATP as a metabolite in a sample. In this embodiment, the sensor is based on a SAM-modified gold electrode that contains peroxide-triggered electroactive molecules (EAMs, sometimes alternatively referred to herein as “redox active moieties” (RAMs)) and acceptor peptide (AP) substrates for BirA (biotin ligase, in this case from E. coli) with physisorbed biotin and BirA (FIG. 13A). FIG. 13B depicts that BirA catalyzes the biotinlyation of the A. After washing, a glucose oxidase-streptavidin conjugate is further conjugated to the biotin attached to the AP. FIG. 13C depicts the reaction when glucose is added and the peroxide generated reacts with the EAMs with the self-immolative moiety, resulting in a change in the E⁰.

FIG. 14. Schematic representation of the electrochemical ATP assay. G3PO may be in solution or immobilized at the SAM interface via biotin-streptavidin.

FIG. 15. Reaction mechanism for representative ferrocene-based EAMs that undergo a peroxide-triggered change in apparent formal potential (E-TRACE). (A.) Starting ferrocenyl EAM that contains an electron-withdrawing carbamate-linked boronate ester-substituted ligand. (B.) Reaction with peroxide leads to an electron-donating amino ligand on the ferrocene which changes the redox potential.

FIG. 16. Electrochemical data for ATP detection. Current was measured by CV (1M LiClO₄, vs AgQRE, Pt counter, 10V/s) at E^(0′)=−220 mV after exposing peroxide-reactive SAMs of ferrocene to 1 mM ATP in a buffer containing 1.33 U/mL of GK and G3PO (10 mM PBS, pH=8.5, 1 mM MgCl₂). Data is presented with positive and negative controls.

FIG. 17. Schematic depiction of the S-MAD assay components and process. The HbA1c is bound by both antibodies where non-glycated Hb is not bound by the GOx labeled antibody and does not contribute to the hydrogen peroxide being generated.

FIG. 18. Plot of results from a feasibility study performed with an optical reporter system on a microplate. A capture antibody for total hemoglobin was first immobilized on a microplate at 50 μg/mL before incubation with samples containing various proportions of A1c/Total hemoglobin all with a fixed, 1 μM total hemoglobin concentration.

FIG. 19. Plot of results using samples containing 3.2, 5.9, 10.2, and 19% hemoglobin A1c at different capture antibody densities. The samples total hemoglobin concentrations were 13.43, 12.8, 10.06, and 10.11 g/dL respectively (1.98, 1.89, 1.48, 1.49 mM).

FIG. 20. Kinetic plot of the results from four different dilutions of a whole blood sample, i.e. different amounts of total Hemoglobin with fixed A1c %. O.D. was normalized to the signal measured from each of these dilutions incubated with no capture antibody present.

FIG. 21 depicts a representative example of a second complex as described above with a binding capture ligand on a solid support binding total Hemoglobin (including for example HbA1c and HbA0). Due to non-preferential capture, HbA1c is captured in the same proportion as the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the sample. The soluble binding ligand has a tag that is an oxidase, particularly in this example a glucose oxidase that produces peroxide.

FIG. 22. A representative example of a second complex as described above with a binding capture ligand on a solid support binding total Hemoglobin (including for example HbA1c and HbA0). Due to non-preferential capture, HbA1c is captured in the same proportion as the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the sample. The soluble binding ligand has a tag that is an alkaline phosphatase that acts as an intermediary enzyme in a system that produces peroxide.

FIG. 23. Schematic representation of the electrochemical A1C assay. The first solid support is the electrode comprising a self-assembled monolayer (SAM), with a covalently attached electroactive active moiety (EAM) comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety (SIM) and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM). The target is bound to the second complex comprising the capture binding ligand on the second solid support, and the soluble binding ligand that is tagged with an intermediary enzyme. After adding substrate for tagged enzyme to said second complex under conditions that peroxide is generated, said peroxide reacts with peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM), thereby removing said self-immolative moiety (SIM) producing a quantifiable electrochemical signal.

FIG. 24. Example Cyclic Voltammagrams of typical response prior to and after reaction of hydrogen peroxide with electro-active moiety (EAM) on a self-assembled monolayer.

FIG. 25. Typical dose response to hydrogen peroxide titration reaction on a E-TRACE modified self-assembled monolayer (SAM)

FIG. 26. Typical Cyclic Voltammagram response of electro-active moiety (EAM) on a self-assembled monolayer after reaction of hydrogen peroxide generated from single measurement assay performed with 4 HbA1c Calibration samples.

FIG. 27. Calibration curve resulting from a dose response to 4 HbA1c Calibration samples at 2.7%, 5.5%, 10.8%, and 19.8% A1c for a 25 min assay procedure.

FIG. 28. Data from 100 clinical samples demonstrating a strong correlation to % A1C measurements collected from the BioRad TurboVariant II clinical immunoanalyzer. Data collected following a 25 min assay procedure

FIG. 29. Dose response for 3 HbA1c Calibration samples at 5.5%, 10.8%, and 19.8% A1c for a 9 min assay procedure.

FIG. 30. Data from 100 clinical samples demonstrating a strong correlation to % A1C measurements collected from the BioRad TurboVariant II clinical immunoanalyzer. Data collected following a 9 min assay procedure.

FIG. 31. A. Data shown for three different target dilutions (30%, 50% and 100%) of four different A1C calibrators (2.7%, 5.5%, 10.8%, and 19.8% A1c). Results demonstrate that different concentrations of total Hemoglobin do not affect the direct measurement of the percentage of A1C using this single measurement approach. Data collected following a 25 min assay. B. Data shown for three different target dilutions (50%, 20% and 5%) of two A1C Calibration Samples (5% and 10.8%) Results demonstrate that different concentrations of total Hemoglobin do not affect the direct measurement of the percentage of A1C using this single measurement approach Data collected following a 9 min assay.

FIG. 32. Data shown for four A1c Calibration Samples (2.7%, 5.5%, 10.8% and 19.8%) measured with two assay formats: One—the novel single measurement approach for direct detection of % A1C and the other calculating the % A1c based on two separate measurements for glycated Hemoglobin (A1C) and total Hemoglobin. The data shows the same A1C measurement is reached using the two different methods.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/253,828, 12/253,875, 12/853,204, 61/332,565, 61/347,121, 61/394,458, 61/366,013, 61/407,828, and 61/547,824 are all incorporated by reference in their entirety.

Overview

The present invention is directed to electronic methods of detecting target analytes such that upon binding of the target analyte a shift in electrochemical potential is seen. This mechanism has been generally described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,595,153, 7,759,073 and 7,713,711, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/253,828, filed Oct. 17, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/253,875, filed Oct. 17, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/332,565, filed May 7, 2010; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/347,121, filed May 21, 2010; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/366,013, filed Jul. 20, 2010, all of which are expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety. The present invention is also directed to electronic methods of detecting the target analyte A1C such that upon binding of the target analyte a conversion of functional groups attached to a transitional metal complex resulting in quantifiable electrochemical signal at two unique potentials, E^(o) ₁ and E^(o) ₂.

The assay relies on the use of an electroactive moiety (“EAM”), which is attached to the electrode and comprises a self-immolative moiety, whose presence gives the EAM a first E⁰, whose absence, upon irreversible cleavage, gives the EAM a second E⁰. The electrode also contains capture binding ligands that will bind the target analyte upon its introduction. A soluble capture ligand is introduced, which also binds the target analyte and comprises a peroxide generating moiety, such as a glucose oxidase enzyme. Upon the addition of oxygen and a substrate for the peroxidase generating moiety (e.g. an oxygen saturated buffer and glucose, in the case of a glucose oxidase enzyme as the peroxidase generating moiety) peroxide is generated, attacking the self-immolative moiety and causing the removal of the self-immolative moiety from the EAM, which results in a change in the E⁰ of the EAM. This difference is detected, and if such a change occurs, it is an indication of the presence of the target analyte.

Thus, to determine whether a target analyte is present in the sample, the sample is applied to the detection electrode surface, optionally washed, and an oxidase enzyme-conjugated secondary binding ligand (for example, an antibody) that binds an alternative epitope of the target analyte is added, creating a “sandwich assay” format with the target. The surface is optionally washed, and treated with an oxygen-saturated buffer containing a high concentration of glucose. The presence of the substrate oxidase enzyme (sometimes referred to herein as “SOX”) on the surface results in the enzymatic creation of hydrogen peroxide in solution which diffuses to the monolayer surface and triggers a chemical elimination reaction (“self-immolative” reaction) in the immobilized EAMs. This irreversible elimination reaction changes the electronic environment of the EAM, for example by altering the “R” groups (e.g. substituent groups) of the transition metal complex, thus shifting the apparent formal potential of the EAM to a second E⁰ to signal the presence of the target.

Accordingly, the present invention provides methods and compositions for detecting target analytes in samples. The single measurement approach for detecting directly the percentage of glycated Hemoglobin is not affected by the amount of total Hemoglobin present in the sample. Since total Hemoglobin, can vary physiologically from 5-20 g/dL, a direct measurement of the same percentage of glycated Hemoglobin across this range is feasible with this approach.

Target Analytes

By “target analyte” or “analyte” or grammatical equivalents herein is meant any molecule, compound or particle to be detected. Target analytes bind to binding ligands (both capture and soluble binding ligands), as is more fully described below. As will be appreciated by those in the art, a large number of analytes may be detected using the present methods; basically, any target analyte for which a binding ligand, described below, may be made may be detected using the methods of the invention.

Suitable analytes include organic and inorganic molecules, including biomolecules. In a preferred embodiment, the analyte may be an environmental pollutant (including pesticides, insecticides, toxins, etc.); a chemical (including solvents, polymers, organic materials, etc.); therapeutic molecules (including therapeutic and abused drugs, antibiotics, etc.); biomolecules (including hormones, cytokines, proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, cellular membrane antigens and receptors (neural, hormonal, nutrient, and cell surface receptors) or their ligands, etc); whole cells (including procaryotic (such as pathogenic bacteria) and eukaryotic cells, including mammalian tumor cells); viruses (including retroviruses, herpesviruses, adenoviruses, lentiviruses, etc.); and spores; etc.

In some embodiments, the target analyte is a protein. As will be appreciated by those in the art, there are a large number of possible proteinaceous target analytes that may be detected using the present invention. By “proteins” or grammatical equivalents herein is meant proteins, oligopeptides and peptides, derivatives and analogs, including proteins containing non-naturally occurring amino acids and amino acid analogs, and peptidomimetic structures. The side chains may be in either the (R) or the (S) configuration. In a preferred embodiment, the amino acids are in the (S) or L configuration. As discussed below, when the protein is used as a binding ligand, it may be desirable to utilize protein analogs to retard degradation by sample contaminants.

Suitable protein target analytes include, but are not limited to, (1) immunoglobulins, particularly IgEs, IgGs and IgMs, and particularly therapeutically or diagnostically relevant antibodies, including but not limited to, for example, antibodies to human albumin, apolipoproteins (including apolipoprotein E), human chorionic gonadotropin, cortisol, α-fetoprotein, thyroxin, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), antithrombin, antibodies to pharmaceuticals (including antieptileptic drugs (phenyloin, primidone, carbariezepin, ethosuximide, valproic acid, and phenobarbitol), cardioactive drugs (digoxin, lidocaine, procainamide, and disopyramide), bronchodilators (theophylline), antibiotics (chloramphenicol, sulfonamides), antidepressants, immunosuppresants, abused drugs (amphetamine, methamphetamine, cannabinoids, cocaine and opiates) and antibodies to any number of viruses (including orthomyxoviruses, (e.g. influenza virus), paramyxoviruses (e.g respiratory syncytial virus, mumps virus, measles virus), adenoviruses, rhinoviruses, coronaviruses, reoviruses, togaviruses (e.g. rubella virus), parvoviruses, poxviruses (e.g. variola virus, vaccinia virus), enteroviruses (e.g. poliovirus, coxsackievirus), hepatitis viruses (including A, B and C), herpesviruses (e.g. Herpes simplex virus, varicella zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein Barr virus), rotaviruses, Norwalk viruses, hantavirus, arenavirus, rhabdovirus (e.g. rabies virus), retroviruses (including HIV, HTLV I and II), papovaviruses (e.g. papillomavirus), polyomaviruses, and picornaviruses, and the like), and bacteria (including a wide variety of pathogenic and non-pathogenic prokaryotes of interest including Bacillus; Vibrio, e.g. V. cholerae; Escherichia, e.g. Enterotoxigenic E. coli, Shigella, e.g. S. dysenteriae; Salmonella, e.g. S. typhi; Mycobacterium e.g. M. tuberculosis, M. leprae; Clostridium, e.g. C. botulinum, C. tetani, C. difficile, C. perfringens; Cornyebacterium, e.g. C. diphtheriae; Streptococcus, S. pyogenes, S. pneumoniae; Staphylococcus, e.g. S. aureus; Haemophilus, e.g. H. influenzae; Neisseria, e.g. N. meningitidis, N. gonorrhoeae; Yersinia, e.g. G. lamblia Y. pestis, Pseudomonas, e.g. P. aeruginosa, P. putida; Chlamydia, e.g. C. trachomatis; Bordetella, e.g. B. pertussis; Treponema, e.g. T. palladium; and the like); (2) enzymes (and other proteins), including but not limited to, enzymes used as indicators of or treatment for heart disease, including creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate amino transferase, troponin T, myoglobin, fibrinogen, cholesterol, triglycerides, thrombin, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA); pancreatic disease indicators including amylase, lipase, chymotrypsin and trypsin; liver function enzymes and proteins including cholinesterase, bilirubin, and alkaline phosphotase; aldolase, prostatic acid phosphatase, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase, and bacterial and viral enzymes such as HIV protease; (3) hormones and cytokines (many of which serve as ligands for cellular receptors) such as erythropoietin (EPO), thrombopoietin (TPO), the interleukins (including IL-1 through IL-17), insulin, insulin-like growth factors (including IGF-1 and -2), epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factors (including TGF-α and TGF-β), human growth hormone, transferrin, epidermal growth factor (EGF), low density lipoprotein, high density lipoprotein, leptin, VEGF, PDGF, ciliary neurotrophic factor, prolactin, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), calcitonin, human chorionic gonadotropin, cotrisol, estradiol, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), leutinzing hormone (LH), progeterone, testosterone; and (4) other proteins (including α-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen CEA.

In addition, any of the biomolecules for which antibodies may be detected may be detected directly as well; that is, detection of virus or bacterial cells, therapeutic and abused drugs, etc., may be done directly.

Suitable target analytes include carbohydrates, including but not limited to, markers for breast cancer (CA15-3, CA 549, CA 27.29), mucin-like carcinoma associated antigen (MCA), ovarian cancer (CA125), pancreatic cancer (DE-PAN-2), and colorectal and pancreatic cancer (CA 19, CA 50, CA242).

Target analytes, including troponin and HbA1c, find use in particular embodiments and applications. In one embodiment, target analytes include glycated proteins such as glycated hemoglobin (e.g., HbA1c), glycated serum proteins, fructosamine, and glycated albumin.

Glycated hemoglobin, in one embodiment hemoglobin A1c (A1c), is widely accepted as a valuable marker of long term glycemic control. Indeed, the American Diabetes Association has accepted A1c as a necessary diagnostic criterion for diabetes mellitus (Type I & II). A1c provides valuable information for evaluating average blood glucose levels over a period of 2-3 months and has particular clinical utility because levels are minimally affected by short, large fluctuations in blood glucose concentration. A1c levels are also an important tool in evaluating the effectiveness of new glycemic control regimens. Typically hemoglobin A1C tests involve two measurements: the measurement of hemoglobin A1c and the measurement of total Hemoglobin. These independent measurements are used to calculate a ratio of A1c to total hemoglobin, providing a numerical assessment of the degree of glycation, generally reported as a percentage (healthy levels range from 4-6.5% A1c).

In one embodiment, a single measurement for determining A1c levels can be performed according to the methods described herein by an electrochemical measurement using the enzyme-triggered redox altering chemical elimination (E-TRACE) reaction, or a standard immunoassay optical test detecting H₂O₂ in solution.

For example, a method for detecting the proportion of hemoglobin A1c to total hemoglobin in a blood sample can described as follows. The surface of the electrochemical platform can be modified to include the sensing molecule (EAM) for the E-TRACE detection of peroxide, as described above, and a universal capture molecule for total hemoglobin. The capture probe (e.g. antibody) can non-preferentially bind all variant types of hemoglobin. The probe may be either tethered to the self-assembled monolayer (SAM) or otherwise locally immobilized onto a secondary solid support such as microparticles, magnetic microparticles, beads, and microchannels. Considering the high physiological concentration of hemoglobin in blood, (g/dL) the primary binding saturates nearly all binding sites on the surface. Thus, samples with different total hemoglobin concentrations can still yield a representative proportion of hemoglobin A1c bound to the surface.

A secondary antibody that binds to the immobilized A1c (anti-A1c) can be introduced to the surface. In certain embodiments, the secondary antibody essentially only binds to the immobilized A1c. In such embodiments, the ELISA-like sandwich complex only forms on sites occupied by A1c and not on sites occupied by non-glycated hemoglobin.

When the anti-A1c antibody is labeled with an oxidase enzyme (SOx), the oxidase label can oxidize a substrate and produce hydrogen peroxide. The hydrogen peroxide generated can react with the electrochemical surface to provide an electrochemical signal.

The amount of signal can be determined and can be directly correlated to the number of sandwich complexes, which is dependent the quantity of A1c immobilized on the surface. Where the amount of immobilized A1c is directly dependent on the percentage of A1c to total hemoglobin in the original sample, the signal observed provides an assessment of the ratio of hemoglobin A1c to total hemoglobin.

For HbA1c, one of the binding ligands, either the capture binding ligand or the soluble binding ligand has specificity for the glycated form of hemoglobin. That is, in one embodiment, the capture binding ligand can bind either form of hemoglobin; after washing the surface, a soluble binding ligand that has specificity only for the glycosylated form (e.g. HbA1c) with the peroxide-generating moiety is added. Alternatively, the capture binding ligand has specificity for Hb1Ac over other forms of hemoglobin, and a soluble capture ligand without such specificity can be used after appropriate washing of the surface. This approach can be used for other target analytes where detection of either the glycosylated or nonglycosylated form is desired. As will be appreciated by those in the art, there are also target analytes for which detection of both forms is desired, and in those embodiments, using binding ligands that do not have specificity for one or the other is used.

Of particular interest in the present invention are assays for Staphylococcus enterotoxin B, P-Selectin, D-dimer, B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP), C Reactive Protein, Myoglobin and CK-MB.

In some embodiments, as outlined herein, a number of different metabolites can serve as target analytes. For example, ATP and/or NADH, can be detected and/or quantified using the systems herein. In addition, other metabolites for which peroxide-generating enzymes exist can be detected using the general mechanisms as outlined herein, including, but not limited to, NADH, glucose, sucrose, lactose, lactate, galactose, glutamate, choline, ethanol, creatinine, etc.

In one particularly useful embodiment, an S-MAD (Single Measurement A1c) assay is provided. The S-MAD assay provides a novel approach to provide a ratio of A1c to total hemoglobin in a single electrochemical measurement and is based, in part, on the E-TRACE assay described in Ohmx's U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/354,200, filed Jan. 19, 2012 which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. provisional application Nos. 61/434,122, filed Jan. 19, 2011 and 61/523,679, filed Aug. 15, 2011 and 12/853,204, filed Aug. 9, 2010, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. provisional application Nos. 61/232,339, filed Aug. 7, 2009, all which are incorporated by reference in their entirety. The E-TRACE assay is basically a sandwich assay on an electrochemical platform with an oxidase-tagged secondary antibody that produces peroxide as a substrate for electrochemical detection.

In one embodiment, a single measurement method for determining the proportion of hemoglobin A1c to total hemoglobin in a blood sample can be performed according to the methods described herein by an electrochemical measurement using the enzyme-triggered redox altering chemical elimination (E-TRACE) reaction, or a standard immunoassay optical test detecting H₂O₂ in solution and is described in the following steps:

Step 1: Modification with Primary Antibody:

The surface of the electrochemical platform is modified to include the sensing molecule (EAM) for the E-TRACE detection of peroxide. Additionally a second solid support is modified with a capture probe. This capture probe, e.g. antibody, binds selectively and equivalently to all variant types of hemoglobin including hemoglobin and glycated hemoglobin. As defined herein, the terms “binds selectively” means binding to a predetermined target (e.g. total hemoglobin including hemoglobin A1c) and “binds equivalently” mean non-preferentially to both the protein (e.g., hemoglobin) and the glycated protein (e.g., hemoglobin A1c).

Step 2: Addition of Target (Total Hemoglobin, Including A1c):

Considering the high physiological concentration of Hemoglobin in blood (g/dL) this primary binding occurs and is assumed to saturate nearly all binding sites on the surface of the secondary support. The importance of this is that samples with different total hemoglobin concentrations will still yield a representative proportion of hemoglobin A1c bound to the surface.

Step 3: Addition of Detection Antibody (Specific for A1c):

In certain embodiments, the secondary antibody is introduced to the surface and only binds to the immobilized A1c. This means the ELISA-like sandwich complex only forms on sites occupied by A1c and not on sites occupied by non-glycated hemoglobin.

Step 4: Signal Transduction and Detection:

The anti-A1c antibody that selectively binds to A1c is labeled with a peroxide-generating system, e.g., an oxidase enzyme (SOx). The oxidase label, oxidizes a substrate and produces hydrogen peroxide. The hydrogen peroxide generated reacts with the electrochemical surface of the solid state platform to provide an electrochemical signal.

The amount of signal is directly correlated to the number of sandwich complexes, which in turn is dependent on how much A1c immobilized on the surface. Since the amount of immobilized A1c is directly dependent on the percentage of A1c to total hemoglobin in the original sample, the signal observed provides an assessment of the ratio (percentage) of hemoglobin A1c to total hemoglobin.

For HbA1c, one of the binding ligands, either the capture binding ligand or the soluble binding ligand has specificity for the glycated form of hemoglobin. That is, in one embodiment, the capture binding ligand can bind either form of hemoglobin; after washing the surface, a soluble binding ligand that has specificity only for the glycated form (i.e. HbA1c) with the peroxide-generating moiety is added. Alternatively, the capture binding ligand has specificity for Hb1Ac over other forms of hemoglobin, and a soluble capture ligand without such specificity can be used after appropriate washing of the surface. This approach can be used for other target analytes where detection of either the glycated or nonglycated form is desired. As will be appreciated by those in the art, there are also target analytes for which detection of both forms is desired, and in those embodiments, using binding ligands that do not have specificity for one or the other is used.

The inventive single-measurement detection of A1c coupled to an electro-active SAM provides a less complex means for determining the proportion of A1c to total hemoglobin in a sample. It offers the advantages of not needing to perform two measurements, as well as eliminating optical measurements, multiple antibody pairs, or percentage calculation algorithms, that introduces further error, based on two separate measurements for A1c and total hemoglobin.

Samples

The target analytes are generally present in samples. As will be appreciated by those in the art, the sample solution may comprise any number of things, including, but not limited to, bodily fluids (including, but not limited to, blood, urine, serum, lymph, saliva, anal and vaginal secretions, perspiration and semen, of virtually any organism, with mammalian samples being preferred and human samples being particularly preferred); environmental samples (including, but not limited to, air, agricultural, water and soil samples); plant materials; biological warfare agent samples; research samples, purified samples, raw samples, etc.; as will be appreciated by those in the art, virtually any experimental manipulation may have been done on the sample. Some embodiments utilize target samples from stored (e.g. frozen and/or archived) or fresh tissues. Paraffin-embedded samples are of particular use in many embodiments, as these samples can be very useful, due to the presence of additional data associated with the samples, such as diagnosis and prognosis. Fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue samples as described herein refers to storable or archival tissue samples. Most patient-derived pathological samples are routinely fixed and paraffin-embedded to allow for histological analysis and subsequent archival storage.

Solid Supports

The target analytes are detected using solid supports comprising electrodes. By “substrate” or “solid support” or other grammatical equivalents herein is meant any material that can be modified to contain discrete individual sites appropriate of the attachment or association of capture ligands. Suitable substrates include metal surfaces such as gold, electrodes as defined below, glass and modified or functionalized glass, fiberglass, teflon, ceramics, mica, plastic (including acrylics, polystyrene and copolymers of styrene and other materials, polypropylene, polyethylene, polybutylene, polyimide, polycarbonate, polyurethanes, Teflon™, and derivatives thereof, etc.), GETEK (a blend of polypropylene oxide and fiberglass), etc, polysaccharides, nylon or nitrocellulose, resins, silica or silica-based materials including silicon and modified silicon, carbon, metals, inorganic glasses and a variety of other polymers, with printed circuit board (PCB) materials being particularly preferred.

The present system finds particular utility in array formats, i.e. wherein there is a matrix of addressable detection electrodes (herein generally referred to “pads”, “addresses” or “micro-locations”). By “array” herein is meant a plurality of capture ligands in an array format; the size of the array will depend on the composition and end use of the array. Arrays containing from about 2 different capture substrates to many thousands can be made.

In a preferred embodiment, the detection electrodes are formed on a substrate. In addition, the discussion herein is generally directed to the use of gold electrodes, but as will be appreciated by those in the art, other electrodes can be used as well. The substrate can comprise a wide variety of materials, as outlined herein and in the cited references.

In general, preferred materials include printed circuit board materials. Circuit board materials are those that comprise an insulating substrate that is coated with a conducting layer and processed using lithography techniques, particularly photolithography techniques, to form the patterns of electrodes and interconnects (sometimes referred to in the art as interconnections or leads). The insulating substrate is generally, but not always, a polymer. As is known in the art, one or a plurality of layers may be used, to make either “two dimensional” (e.g. all electrodes and interconnections in a plane) or “three dimensional” (wherein the electrodes are on one surface and the interconnects may go through the board to the other side or wherein electrodes are on a plurality of surfaces) boards. Three dimensional systems frequently rely on the use of drilling or etching, followed by electroplating with a metal such as copper, such that the “through board” interconnections are made. Circuit board materials are often provided with a foil already attached to the substrate, such as a copper foil, with additional copper added as needed (for example for interconnections), for example by electroplating. The copper surface may then need to be roughened, for example through etching, to allow attachment of the adhesion layer.

Accordingly, in a preferred embodiment, the present invention provides biochips (sometimes referred to herein “chips”) that comprise substrates comprising a plurality of electrodes, preferably gold electrodes. The number of electrodes is as outlined for arrays. Each electrode preferably comprises a self-assembled monolayer as outlined herein. In a preferred embodiment, one of the monolayer-forming species comprises a capture ligand as outlined herein. In addition, each electrode has an interconnection, that is attached to the electrode at one end and is ultimately attached to a device that can control the electrode. That is, each electrode is independently addressable.

Finally, the compositions of the invention can include a wide variety of additional components, including microfluidic components and robotic components (see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,942,771 and 7,312,087 and related cases, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety), and detection systems including computers utilizing signal processing techniques (see for example U.S. Pat. No. 6,740,518, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety).

For the S-MAD method, a binding ligand that binds non-preferentially to proteins and their glycated counterpart proteins may be optionally bound to a second solid support. Any suitable second solid support may be used, including without limitation, microparticles, magnetic microparticles, beads, and microchannels.

Electrodes

The solid supports of the invention comprise electrodes. By “electrodes” herein is meant a composition, which, when connected to an electronic device, is able to sense a current or charge and convert it to a signal. Preferred electrodes are known in the art and include, but are not limited to, certain metals and their oxides, including gold; platinum; palladium; silicon; aluminum; metal oxide electrodes including platinum oxide, titanium oxide, tin oxide, indium tin oxide, palladium oxide, silicon oxide, aluminum oxide, molybdenum oxide (Mo206), tungsten oxide (WO3) and ruthenium oxides; and carbon (including glassy carbon electrodes, graphite and carbon paste). Preferred electrodes include gold, silicon, carbon and metal oxide electrodes, with gold being particularly preferred.

The electrodes described herein are depicted as a flat surface, which is only one of the possible conformations of the electrode and is for schematic purposes only. The conformation of the electrode will vary with the detection method used.

The electrodes of the invention are generally incorporated into biochip cartridges and can take a wide variety of configurations, and can include working and reference electrodes, interconnects (including “through board” interconnects), and microfluidic components. See for example U.S. Pat. No. 7,312,087, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In addition, the biochips generally include a working electrode with the components described herein, a reference electrode, and a counter/auxiliary electrode.

The biochip cartridges include substrates comprising the arrays of biomolecules, and can be configured in a variety of ways. For example, the chips can include reaction chambers with inlet and outlet ports for the introduction and removal of reagents. In addition, the cartridges can include caps or lids that have microfluidic components, such that the sample can be introduced, reagents added, reactions done, and then the sample is added to the reaction chamber comprising the array for detection.

Self-Assembled Monolayers

The electrodes comprise a self-assembled monolayer (“SAM”). By “monolayer” or “self-assembled monolayer” or “SAM” herein is meant a relatively ordered assembly of molecules spontaneously chemisorbed on a surface, in which the molecules are oriented approximately parallel to each other and roughly perpendicular to the surface. Each of the molecules includes a functional group that adheres to the surface, and a portion that interacts with neighboring molecules in the monolayer to form the relatively ordered array. A “mixed” monolayer comprises a heterogeneous monolayer, that is, where at least two different molecules make up the monolayer. As outlined herein, the use of a monolayer reduces the amount of non-specific binding of biomolecules to the surface, and, in the case of nucleic acids, increases the efficiency of oligonucleotide hybridization as a result of the distance of the oligonucleotide from the electrode. Thus, a monolayer facilitates the maintenance of the target enzyme away from the electrode surface. In addition, a monolayer serves to keep charge carriers away from the surface of the electrode. Thus, this layer helps to prevent electrical contact between the electrodes and the ReAMs, or between the electrode and charged species within the solvent. Such contact can result in a direct “short circuit” or an indirect short circuit via charged species which may be present in the sample. Accordingly, the monolayer is preferably tightly packed in a uniform layer on the electrode surface, such that a minimum of “holes” exist. The monolayer thus serves as a physical barrier to block solvent accessibility to the electrode.

In some embodiments, the monolayer comprises conductive oligomers, and in particular, conductive oligomers are generally used to attach the EAM to the electrode surface, as described below. By “conductive oligomer” herein is meant a substantially conducting oligomer, preferably linear, some embodiments of which are referred to in the literature as “molecular wires”. By “substantially conducting” herein is meant that the oligomer is capable of transferring electrons at 100 Hz. Generally, the conductive oligomer has substantially overlapping π-orbitals, i.e. conjugated π-orbitals, as between the monomeric units of the conductive oligomer, although the conductive oligomer may also contain one or more sigma (σ) bonds. Additionally, a conductive oligomer may be defined functionally by its ability to inject or receive electrons into or from an associated EAM. Furthermore, the conductive oligomer is more conductive than the insulators as defined herein. Additionally, the conductive oligomers of the invention are to be distinguished from electroactive polymers, that themselves may donate or accept electrons.

A more detailed description of conductive oligomers is found in WO/1999/57317, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. In particular, the conductive oligomers as shown in Structures 1 to 9 on page 14 to 21 of WO/1999/57317 find use in the present invention. In some embodiments, the conductive oligomer has the following structure:

In addition, the terminus of at least some of the conductive oligomers in the monolayer is electronically exposed. By “electronically exposed” herein is meant that upon the placement of an EAM in close proximity to the terminus, and after initiation with the appropriate signal, a signal dependent on the presence of the EAM may be detected. The conductive oligomers may or may not have terminal groups. Thus, in a preferred embodiment, there is no additional terminal group, and the conductive oligomer terminates with a terminal group; for example, such as an acetylene bond. Alternatively, in some embodiments, a terminal group is added, sometimes depicted herein as “Q”. A terminal group may be used for several reasons; for example, to contribute to the electronic availability of the conductive oligomer for detection of EAMs, or to alter the surface of the SAM for other reasons, for example to prevent non-specific binding. For example, there may be negatively charged groups on the terminus to form a negatively charged surface such that when the target analyte is nucleic acid such as DNA or RNA, the nucleic acid is repelled or prevented from lying down on the surface, to facilitate hybridization. Preferred terminal groups include —NH, —OH, —COOH, and alkyl groups such as —CH₃, and (poly)alkyloxides such as (poly)ethylene glycol, with —OCH₂CH₂OH, —(OCH₂CH₂O)₂H, —(OCH₂CH₂O)₃H, and —(OCH₂CH₂O)₄H being preferred.

In one embodiment, it is possible to use mixtures of conductive oligomers with different types of terminal groups. Thus, for example, some of the terminal groups may facilitate detection, and some may prevent non-specific binding.

In some embodiments, the electrode further comprises a passivation agent, preferably in the form of a monolayer on the electrode surface. For some analytes the efficiency of analyte binding (i.e. hybridization) may increase when the binding ligand is at a distance from the electrode. In addition, the presence of a monolayer can decrease non-specific binding to the surface (which can be further facilitated by the use of a terminal group, outlined herein. A passivation agent layer facilitates the maintenance of the binding ligand and/or analyte away from the electrode surface. In addition, a passivation agent serves to keep charge carriers away from the surface of the electrode. Thus, this layer helps to prevent electrical contact between the electrodes and the electron transfer moieties, or between the electrode and charged species within the solvent. Such contact can result in a direct “short circuit” or an indirect short circuit via charged species which may be present in the sample. Accordingly, the monolayer of passivation agents is preferably tightly packed in a uniform layer on the electrode surface, such that a minimum of “holes” exist. Alternatively, the passivation agent may not be in the form of a monolayer, but may be present to help the packing of the conductive oligomers or other characteristics.

The passivation agents thus serve as a physical barrier to block solvent accessibility to the electrode. As such, the passivation agents themselves may in fact be either (1) conducting or (2) nonconducting, i.e. insulating, molecules. Thus, in one embodiment, the passivation agents are conductive oligomers, as described herein, with or without a terminal group to block or decrease the transfer of charge to the electrode. Other passivation agents which may be conductive include oligomers of —(CF₂)_(n)—, —(CHF)_(n)— and —(CFR)_(n)—. In a preferred embodiment, the passivation agents are insulator moieties.

In some embodiments, the monolayers comprise insulators. An “insulator” is a substantially nonconducting oligomer, preferably linear. By “substantially nonconducting” herein is meant that the rate of electron transfer through the insulator is slower than the rate of electron transfer through the conductive oligomer. Stated differently, the electrical resistance of the insulator is higher than the electrical resistance of the conductive oligomer. It should be noted however that even oligomers generally considered to be insulators, such as —(CH2)16 molecules, still may transfer electrons, albeit at a slow rate.

In some embodiments, the insulators have a conductivity, S, of about 10⁻⁷Ω-1 cm⁻¹ or lower, with less than about 10⁻⁸Ω⁻¹ cm⁻¹ being preferred. Gardner et al., Sensors and Actuators A 51 (1995) 57-66, incorporated herein by reference.

Generally, insulators are alkyl or heteroalkyl oligomers or moieties with sigma bonds, although any particular insulator molecule may contain aromatic groups or one or more conjugated bonds. By “heteroalkyl” herein is meant an alkyl group that has at least one heteroatom, i.e. nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur, phosphorus, silicon or boron included in the chain. Alternatively, the insulator may be quite similar to a conductive oligomer with the addition of one or more heteroatoms or bonds that serve to inhibit or slow, preferably substantially, electron transfer. In some embodiments the insulator comprises C6-C16 alkyl.

The passivation agents, including insulators, may be substituted with R groups as defined herein to alter the packing of the moieties or conductive oligomers on an electrode, the hydrophilicity or hydrophobicity of the insulator, and the flexibility, i.e. the rotational, torsional or longitudinal flexibility of the insulator. For example, branched alkyl groups may be used. In addition, the terminus of the passivation agent, including insulators, may contain an additional group to influence the exposed surface of the monolayer, sometimes referred to herein as a terminal group (“TG”). For example, the addition of charged, neutral or hydrophobic groups may be done to inhibit non-specific binding from the sample, or to influence the kinetics of binding of the analyte, etc. For example, there may be charged groups on the terminus to form a charged surface to encourage or discourage binding of certain target analytes or to repel or prevent from lying down on the surface.

The length of the passivation agent will vary as needed. Generally, the length of the passivation agents is similar to the length of the conductive oligomers, as outlined above. In addition, the conductive oligomers may be basically the same length as the passivation agents or longer than them, resulting in the binding ligands being more accessible to the peroxide.

The monolayer may comprise a single type of passivation agent, including insulators, or different types.

Suitable insulators are known in the art, and include, but are not limited to, —(CH₂)_(n)—, —(CRH)_(n)—, and —(CR₂)_(n)—, ethylene glycol or derivatives using other heteroatoms in place of oxygen, i.e. nitrogen or sulfur (sulfur derivatives are not preferred when the electrode is gold). In some embodiments, the insulator comprises C6 to C16 alkyl.

In some embodiments, the electrode is a metal surface and need not necessarily have interconnects or the ability to do electrochemistry.

Electroactive Moieties

In addition to the SAMs, the electrodes comprise an EAM. By “electroactive moiety (EAM)” or “transition metal complex” or “redox active molecule” or “electron transfer moiety (ETM)” herein is meant a metal-containing compound which is capable of reversibly or semi-reversibly transferring one or more electrons. It is to be understood that electron donor and acceptor capabilities are relative; that is, a molecule which can lose an electron under certain experimental conditions will be able to accept an electron under different experimental conditions.

It is to be understood that the number of possible transition metal complexes is very large, and that one skilled in the art of electron transfer compounds will be able to utilize a number of compounds in the present invention. By “transitional metal” herein is meant metals whose atoms have a partial or completed shell of electrons. Suitable transition metals for use in the invention include, but are not limited to, cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), cobalt (Co), palladium (Pd), zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), ruthenium (Ru), rhodium (Rh), osmium (Os), rhenium (Re), platinum (Pt), scandium (Sc), titanium (Ti), Vanadium (V), chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), Molybdenum (Mo), technetium (Tc), tungsten (W), and iridium (Ir). That is, the first series of transition metals, the platinum metals (Ru, Rh, Pd, Os, Ir and Pt), along with Fe, Re, W, Mo and Tc, find particular use in the present invention. Metals that find use in the invention also are those that do not change the number of coordination sites upon a change in oxidation state, including ruthenium, osmium, iron, platinum and palladium, with osmium, ruthenium and iron being especially useful. Generally, transition metals are depicted herein (or in incorporated references) as TM or M.

The transitional metal and the coordinating ligands form a metal complex. By “ligand” or “coordinating ligand” (depicted herein or in incorporated references in the figures as “L”) herein is meant an atom, ion, molecule, or functional group that generally donates one or more of its electrons through a coordinate covalent bond to, or shares its electrons through a covalent bond with, one or more central atoms or ions.

In some embodiments, small polar ligands are used; suitable small polar ligands, generally depicted herein as “L”, fall into two general categories, as is more fully described herein. In one embodiment, the small polar ligands will be effectively irreversibly bound to the metal ion, due to their characteristics as generally poor leaving groups or as good sigma donors, and the identity of the metal. These ligands may be referred to as “substitutionally inert”. Alternatively, as is more fully described below, the small polar ligands may be reversibly bound to the metal ion, such that upon binding of a target analyte, the analyte may provide one or more coordination atoms for the metal, effectively replacing the small polar ligands, due to their good leaving group properties or poor sigma donor properties. These ligands may be referred to as “substitutionally labile”. The ligands preferably form dipoles, since this will contribute to a high solvent reorganization energy.

Some of the structures of transitional metal complexes are shown below:

L are the co-ligands, that provide the coordination atoms for the binding of the metal ion. As will be appreciated by those in the art, the number and nature of the co-ligands will depend on the coordination number of the metal ion. Mono-, di- or polydentate co-ligands may be used at any position. Thus, for example, when the metal has a coordination number of six, the L from the terminus of the conductive oligomer, the L contributed from the nucleic acid, and r, add up to six. Thus, when the metal has a coordination number of six, r may range from zero (when all coordination atoms are provided by the other two ligands) to four, when all the co-ligands are monodentate. Thus generally, r will be from 0 to 8, depending on the coordination number of the metal ion and the choice of the other ligands.

In one embodiment, the metal ion has a coordination number of six and both the ligand attached to the conductive oligomer and the ligand attached to the nucleic acid are at least bidentate; that is, r is preferably zero, one (i.e. the remaining co-ligand is bidentate) or two (two monodentate co-ligands are used).

As will be appreciated in the art, the co-ligands can be the same or different. Suitable ligands fall into two categories: ligands which use nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur, carbon or phosphorus atoms (depending on the metal ion) as the coordination atoms (generally referred to in the literature as sigma (a) donors) and organometallic ligands such as metallocene ligands (generally referred to in the literature as pi (π) donors, and depicted herein as Lm). Suitable nitrogen donating ligands are well known in the art and include, but are not limited to, cyano (C≡N), NH2; NHR; NRR′; pyridine; pyrazine; isonicotinamide; imidazole; bipyridine and substituted derivatives of bipyridine; terpyridine and substituted derivatives; phenanthrolines, particularly 1,10-phenanthroline (abbreviated phen) and substituted derivatives of phenanthrolines such as 4,7-dimethylphenanthroline and dipyridol[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine (abbreviated dppz); dipyridophenazine; 1,4,5,8,9,12-hexaazatriphenylene (abbreviated hat); 9,10-phenanthrenequinone diimine (abbreviated phi); 1,4,5,8-tetraazaphenanthrene (abbreviated tap); 1,4,8,11-tetra-azacyclotetradecane (abbreviated cyclam) and isocyanide. Substituted derivatives, including fused derivatives, may also be used. In some embodiments, porphyrins and substituted derivatives of the porphyrin family may be used. See for example, Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry, Ed. Wilkinson et al., Pergammon Press, 1987, Chapters 13.2 (pp 73-98), 21.1 (pp. 813-898) and 21.3 (pp 915-957), all of which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference.

As will be appreciated in the art, any ligand donor(1)-bridge-donor(2) where donor (1) binds to the metal and donor(2) is available for interaction with the surrounding medium (solvent, protein, etc) can be used in the present invention, especially if donor(1) and donor(2) are coupled through a pi system, as in cyanos (C is donor(1), N is donor(2), pi system is the CN triple bond). One example is bipyrimidine, which looks much like bipyridine but has N donors on the “back side” for interactions with the medium. Additional co-ligands include, but are not limited to cyanates, isocyanates (—N═C═O), thiocyanates, isonitrile, N₂, O₂, carbonyl, halides, alkoxyide, thiolates, amides, phosphides, and sulfur containing compound such as sulfino, sulfonyl, sulfoamino, and sulfamoyl.

In some embodiments, multiple cyanos are used as co-ligand to complex with different metals. For example, seven cyanos bind Re(III); eight bind Mo(IV) and W(IV). Thus at Re(III) with 6 or less cyanos and one or more L, or Mo(IV) or W(IV) with 7 or less cyanos and one or more L can be used in the present invention. The EAM with W(IV) system has particular advantages over the others because it is more inert, easier to prepare, more favorable reduction potential. Generally that a larger CN/L ratio will give larger shifts.

Suitable sigma donating ligands using carbon, oxygen, sulfur and phosphorus are known in the art. For example, suitable sigma carbon donors are found in Cotton and Wilkenson, Advanced Organic Chemistry, 5th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1988, hereby incorporated by reference; see page 38, for example. Similarly, suitable oxygen ligands include crown ethers, water and others known in the art. Phosphines and substituted phosphines are also suitable; see page 38 of Cotton and Wilkenson.

The oxygen, sulfur, phosphorus and nitrogen-donating ligands are attached in such a manner as to allow the heteroatoms to serve as coordination atoms.

In some embodiments, organometallic ligands are used. In addition to purely organic compounds for use as redox moieties, and various transition metal coordination complexes with δ-bonded organic ligand with donor atoms as heterocyclic or exocyclic substituents, there is available a wide variety of transition metal organometallic compounds with .pi.-bonded organic ligands (see Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, 5th Ed., Cotton & Wilkinson, John Wiley & Sons, 1988, chapter 26; Organometallics, A Concise Introduction, Elschenbroich et al., 2nd Ed., 1992, VCH; and Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry II, A Review of the Literature 1982-1994, Abel et al. Ed., Vol. 7, chapters 7, 8, 10 & 11, Pergamon Press, hereby expressly incorporated by reference). Such organometallic ligands include cyclic aromatic compounds such as the cyclopentadienide ion [C₅H₅ (−1)] and various ring substituted and ring fused derivatives, such as the indenylide (−1) ion, that yield a class of bis(cyclopentadieyl)metal compounds, (i.e. the metallocenes); see for example Robins et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104:1882-1893 (1982); and Gassman et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108:4228-4229 (1986), incorporated by reference. Of these, ferrocene [(C₅H₅)₂Fe] and its derivatives are prototypical examples which have been used in a wide variety of chemical (Connelly et al., Chem. Rev. 96:877-910 (1996), incorporated by reference) and electrochemical (Geiger et al., Advances in Organometallic Chemistry 23:1-93; and Geiger et al., Advances in Organometallic Chemistry 24:87, incorporated by reference) electron transfer or “redox” reactions. Metallocene derivatives of a variety of the first, second and third row transition metals are potential candidates as redox moieties that are covalently attached to either the ribose ring or the nucleoside base of nucleic acid. Other potentially suitable organometallic ligands include cyclic arenes such as benzene, to yield bis(arene)metal compounds and their ring substituted and ring fused derivatives, of which bis(benzene)chromium is a prototypical example. Other acyclic π-bonded ligands such as the allyl(−1) ion, or butadiene yield potentially suitable organometallic compounds, and all such ligands, in conduction with other .pi.-bonded and .delta.-bonded ligands constitute the general class of organometallic compounds in which there is a metal to carbon bond. Electrochemical studies of various dimers and oligomers of such compounds with bridging organic ligands, and additional non-bridging ligands, as well as with and without metal-metal bonds are potential candidate redox moieties in nucleic acid analysis.

When one or more of the co-ligands is an organometallic ligand, the ligand is generally attached via one of the carbon atoms of the organometallic ligand, although attachment may be via other atoms for heterocyclic ligands. Preferred organometallic ligands include metallocene ligands, including substituted derivatives and the metalloceneophanes (see page 1174 of Cotton and Wilkenson, supra). For example, derivatives of metallocene ligands such as methylcyclopentadienyl, with multiple methyl groups being preferred, such as pentamethylcyclopentadienyl, can be used to increase the stability of the metallocene. In a preferred embodiment, only one of the two metallocene ligands of a metallocene are derivatized.

As described herein, any combination of ligands may be used. Preferred combinations include: a) all ligands are nitrogen donating ligands; b) all ligands are organometallic ligands; and c) the ligand at the terminus of the conductive oligomer is a metallocene ligand and the ligand provided by the nucleic acid is a nitrogen donating ligand, with the other ligands, if needed, are either nitrogen donating ligands or metallocene ligands, or a mixture.

As a general rule, EAM comprising non-macrocyclic chelators are bound to metal ions to form non-macrocyclic chelate compounds, since the presence of the metal allows for multiple proligands to bind together to give multiple oxidation states.

In some embodiments, nitrogen donating proligands are used. Suitable nitrogen donating proligands are well known in the art and include, but are not limited to, NH2; NHR; NRR′; pyridine; pyrazine; isonicotinamide; imidazole; bipyridine and substituted derivatives of bipyridine; terpyridine and substituted derivatives; phenanthrolines, particularly 1,10-phenanthroline (abbreviated phen) and substituted derivatives of phenanthrolines such as 4,7-dimethylphenanthroline and dipyridol[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine (abbreviated dppz); dipyridophenazine; 1,4,5,8,9,12-hexaazatriphenylene (abbreviated hat); 9,10-phenanthrenequinone diimine (abbreviated phi); 1,4,5,8-tetraazaphenanthrene (abbreviated tap); 1,4,8,11-tetra-azacyclotetradecane (abbreviated cyclam) and isocyanide. Substituted derivatives, including fused derivatives, may also be used. It should be noted that macrocylic ligands that do not coordinatively saturate the metal ion, and which require the addition of another proligand, are considered non-macrocyclic for this purpose. As will be appreciated by those in the art, it is possible to covalent attach a number of “non-macrocyclic” ligands to form a coordinatively saturated compound, but that is lacking a cyclic skeleton.

In some embodiments, a mixture of monodentate (e.g. at least one cyano ligand), bi-dentate, tri-dentate, and polydentate ligands can be used in the construction of EAMs.

Of particular use in the present invention are EAMs that are metallocenes, and in particular ferrocenes, which have at least a first self-immolative moiety attached, although in some embodiments, more than one self-immolative moiety is attached as is described below (it should also be noted that other EAMs, as are broadly described herein, with self-immolative moieties can also be used). In some embodiments, when more than one self-immolative moiety is attached to a ferrocene, they are all attached to one of the cyclopentydienyl rings. In some embodiments, the self-immolative moieties are attached to different rings. In some embodiments, it is possible to saturate one or both of the cyclopentydienyl rings with self-immolative moieties, as long as one site is used for attachment to the electrode.

In addition, EAMs generally have an attachment moiety for attachment of the EAM to the conductive oligomer which is used to attach the EAM to the electrode. In general, although not required, in the case of metallocenes such as ferrocenes, the self-immolative moiety(ies) are attached to one of the cyclopentydienyl rings, and the attachment moiety is attached to the other ring, as is generally depicted in FIG. 1, although attachment to the same ring can also be done. As will be appreciated by those in the art, any combination of self-immolative moieties and at least one attachment linker can be used, and on either ring.

In addition to the self-immolative moiety(ies) and the attachment moiety(ies), the ferrocene can comprise additional substituent groups, which can be added for a variety of reasons, including altering the E⁰ in the presence or absence of at least the self-immolative group. Suitable substituent groups, frequently depicted in associated and incorporated references as “R” groups, are recited in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/253,828, filed Oct. 17, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/253,875, filed Oct. 17, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/332,565, filed May 7, 2010; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/347,121, filed May 21, 2010; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/366,013, filed Jul. 20, 2010, hereby incorporated by reference.

In some embodiments, such as depicted below, the EAM does not comprise a self-immolative moiety, in the case where the peroxide-sensitive moiety is attached directly to the EAM and provides a change in E⁰ when the peroxide-sensitive moiety is exposed to peroxide. As shown below, one embodiment allows the peroxide-sensitive moiety to be attached directly to the EAM (in this case, a ferrocene), such that the ferrocene has a first E⁰ when the pinacol boronate ester moiety is attached, and a second E⁰ when removed, e.g. in the presence of the peroxide.

Self-Immolative Moieties

The EAMs of the invention include at least one self-immolative moiety that is covalently attached to the EAM such that the EAM has a first E⁰ when it is present and a second E⁰ when it has been removed as described below.

The term “self-immolative spacer” refers to a bifunctional chemical moiety that is capable of covalently linking two chemical moieties into a normally stable tripartate molecule. The self-immolative spacer is capable of spontaneously separating from the second moiety if the bond to the first moiety is cleaved. In the present invention, the self-immolative spacer links a peroxide sensitive moiety, e.g. a boron moiety, to the EAM. Upon exposure to peroxide, the boron moiety is removed and the spacer falls apart, as generally depicted in FIG. 1. Generally speaking, any spacer where irreversible repetitive bond rearrangement reactions are initiated by an electron-donating alcohol functional group (i.e. quinone methide motifs) can be designed with boron groups serving as triggering moieties that generate alcohols under oxidative conditions. Alternatively, the boron moiety can mask a latent phenolic oxygen in a ligand that is a pro-chelator for a transition metal. Upon oxidation, the ligand is transformed and initiates EAM formation in the SAM. For example, a sample chelating ligand is salicaldehyde isonicotinoyl hydrazone that binds iron.

As will be appreciated by those in the art, a wide variety of self-immolative moieties may be used with a wide variety of EAMs and peroxide sensitive moieties. Self-immolative linkers have been described in a number of references, including US Publication Nos. 20090041791; 20100145036 and U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,705,045 and 7,223,837, all of which are expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety, particularly for the disclosure of self-immolative spacers.

A few self-immolative linkers of particular use in the present invention are shown in FIG. 6. The self-immolative spacer can comprise a single monomeric unit or polymers, either of the same monomers (homopolymers) or of different monomers (heteropolymers). Alternatively, the self-immolative spacer can be a neighboring group to an EAM in a SAM that changes the environment of the EAM following cleavage analogous to the chemistry as recited in previous application “Electrochemical Assay for the Detection of Enzymes”, U.S. Ser. No. 12/253,828, PCT/US2008/080363, hereby incorporated by reference.

Peroxide Sensitive Moieties

The self-immolative spacers join the peroxide sensitive moieties (PSMs, sometimes referred to herein as POMs) and the EAMs of the invention. In general, a peroxide sensitive moiety is one containing boron as depicted in FIG. 1.

For example, the figures herein depict the use of ferrocene derivatives, where the peroxide triggers a change from a benzyl carbamate with a p-substituted pinacol borate ester to an amine. This self-eliminating group has been described previously for generating amine-functionalized florophores in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (Sella, E.; Shabat, D. Self-immolative dendritic probe for the direct detection of triacetone triperoxide. Chem. Commun. 2008, 5701-5703; and Lo, L.-CI; Chu, C.-Y. Development of highly selective and sensitive probes for hydrogen peroxide. Chem. Commun. 2003, 2728-2729 both of which are incorporated by reference. Other such groups (aryl borate esters and arylboronic acids) are also described in Sella and Lo. In addition, ferrocenylamines are known to exhibit redox behavior at lower potentials (˜150 mV) as compared to their corresponding carbamate derviatives (see Sagi et al., Amperometric Assay for Aldolase Activity; Antibody-Catalyzed Ferrocenylamine Formation. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 1459-1461, incorporated by reference herein).

Capture and Soluble Binding Ligands

In addition to SAMs and EAMs, in some embodiments, the electrodes comprise capture binding ligands. By “binding ligand” or “binding species” herein is meant a compound that is used to probe for the presence of the target analyte and that will bind to the target analyte. In general, for most of the embodiments described herein, there are at least two binding ligands used per target analyte molecule; a “capture” or “anchor” binding ligand that is attached to the detection surface, and a soluble binding ligand, that binds independently to the target analyte, and either directly or indirectly comprises at least one label such as a SOX. By “capture binding ligand” herein is meant a binding ligand that binds the target analyte that is attached to the electrode surface that binds the target analyte. By “soluble binding ligand” herein is meant a binding ligand that is in solution that binds the target analyte at a different site than the capture binding ligand.

As will be appreciated by those in the art, the composition of the binding ligand will depend on the composition of the target analyte. Binding ligands for a wide variety of analytes are known or can be readily found using known techniques. For example, when the analyte is a protein, the binding ligands include proteins (particularly including antibodies or fragments thereof (FAbs, etc.)) or small molecules. Non-limiting representative examples of particularly useful binding ligands for proteins and glycated proteins include monoclonal antibodies, fragments of monoclonal antibodies, polyclonal antibodies, fragments of polyclonal antibodies, proteins, and peptides.

In general, antibodies are useful as both capture and soluble binding ligands.

In one aspect, the soluble binding ligand comprises a peroxide generating system. As defined herein, the term “peroxide generating system” or “peroxide-generating system” means an enzyme that directly generates a peroxide from its substrate or an intermediary enzyme component that generates an intermediate, e.g., a cofactor or pre-substrate, for another enzyme that in turn generates a peroxide. In one example, a peroxide generating moiety may be an enzyme that generates peroxide. A wide variety of such enzymes are known, including glucose oxidase, acyl CoA oxidases, alcohol oxidases, aldehyde oxidases, etc. A wide variety of suitable oxidase enzymes are known in the art (see any glucose oxidase enzyme classified as EC 1.1.3.4, including, but not limited to, glucose oxidase, D-amino acid oxidase (DAAO) and choline oxidase). Glucose oxidase enzymes from a wide variety of organisms are well known, including bacterial, fungal and animal (including mammalian), including, but not limited to, Aspergillus species (e.g. A. niger), Penicillum species, Streptomyces species, mouse, etc.). Also of use are acyl CoA oxidases, classified as EC 1.3.3.6.

Alternatively, the peroxide generating system may include an intermediary enzyme component. For instance, the soluble binding ligand may contain an enzyme, such as alkaline phosphatase (AP), that catalyzes the generation of a necessary cofactor from a phosphorylated precursor for a soluble apo-oxidase enzyme (i.e. FADP converted to FAD which binds to apo-DAAO) which in turn generates peroxide by reaction with substrate. This strategy enables cascade amplification of target binding events if the concentrations of apo-enzyme, phosphorylated cofactor, and oxidase enzyme substrate are high with respect to the surface immobilized target.

Generally, the capture binding ligand allows the attachment of a target analyte to the detection surface, for the purposes of detection. In one embodiment, the binding is specific, and the binding ligand is part of a binding pair. By “specifically bind” herein is meant that the ligand binds the analyte, with specificity sufficient to differentiate between the analyte and other components or contaminants of the test sample. The binding should be sufficient to allow the analyte to remain bound under the conditions of the assay, including wash steps to remove non-specific binding. In some embodiments, for example in the detection of certain biomolecules, the binding constants of the analyte to the binding ligand will be at least about 10⁻⁴ to 10⁻⁹ M⁻¹, with at least about 10⁻⁵ to 10⁻⁹ being preferred and at least about 10⁻⁷ to 10⁻⁹ M⁻¹ being particularly preferred.

Binding ligands to a wide variety of analytes are known or can be readily found using known techniques. For example, when the analyte is a single-stranded nucleic acid, the binding ligand is generally a substantially complementary nucleic acid. Alternatively, as is generally described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,270,163, 5,475,096, 5,567,588, 5,595,877, 5,637,459, 5,683,867, 5,705,337, and related patents, hereby incorporated by reference, nucleic acid “aptamers” can be developed for binding to virtually any target analyte. Similarly the analyte may be a nucleic acid binding protein and the capture binding ligand is either a single-stranded or double-stranded nucleic acid; alternatively, the binding ligand may be a nucleic acid binding protein when the analyte is a single or double-stranded nucleic acid. When the analyte is a protein, the binding ligands include proteins (particularly including antibodies or fragments thereof (FAbs, etc.)), small molecules, or aptamers, described above. Preferred binding ligand proteins include antibodies and peptides. As will be appreciated by those in the art, any two molecules that will associate, preferably specifically, may be used, either as the analyte or the binding ligand. Suitable analyte/binding ligand pairs include, but are not limited to, antibodies/antigens, receptors/ligand, proteins/nucleic acids; nucleic acids/nucleic acids, enzymes/substrates and/or inhibitors, carbohydrates (including glycoproteins and glycolipids)/lectins, carbohydrates and other binding partners, proteins/proteins; and protein/small molecules. These may be wild-type or derivative sequences.

The capture binding ligands (e.g. a capture antibody) can be covalently coupled to the electrode (usually through an attachment linker) or bound tightly but not covalently; for example, using biotin/streptavidin reactions (e.g. biotin on the surface of the SAM, streptavin-conjugated capture ligand such as an antibody, or vice versa), bound via a nucleic acid reaction (for example, the capture ligand can have a nucleic acid (“Watson”) and the surface can have a complementary nucleic acid (“Crick”), bound using protein G binding to the Fc fragment of the antibody, etc.

It should also be noted that the invention described herein can also be used as a sensor for the illicit explosive triacetone triperoxide (TATP).

Anchor Groups

The present invention provides compounds including the EAM (optionally attached to the electrode surface with a conductive oligomer), the SAM, and the capture binding ligands on the electrode surface. Generally, in some embodiments, these moieties are attached to the electrode using anchor group. By “anchor” or “anchor group” herein is meant a chemical group that attaches the compounds of the invention to an electrode.

As will be appreciated by those in the art, the composition of the anchor group will vary depending on the composition of the surface to which it is attached. In the case of gold electrodes, both pyridinyl anchor groups and thiol based anchor groups find particular use.

The covalent attachment of the conductive oligomer may be accomplished in a variety of ways, depending on the electrode and the conductive oligomer used. Generally, some type of linker is used, as depicted below as “A” in Structure 1, where X is the conductive oligomer, and the hatched surface is the electrode:

In this embodiment, A is a linker or atom. The choice of “A” will depend in part on the characteristics of the electrode. Thus, for example, A may be a sulfur moiety when a gold electrode is used. Alternatively, when metal oxide electrodes are used, A may be a silicon (silane) moiety attached to the oxygen of the oxide (see for example Chen et al., Langmuir 10:3332-3337 (1994); Lenhard et al., J. Electroanal. Chem. 78:195-201 (1977), both of which are expressly incorporated by reference). When carbon based electrodes are used, A may be an amino moiety (preferably a primary amine; see for example Deinhammer et al., Langmuir 10:1306-1313 (1994)). Thus, preferred A moieties include, but are not limited to, silane moieties, sulfur moieties (including alkyl sulfur moieties), and amino moieties.

In some embodiments, the electrode is a carbon electrode, i.e. a glassy carbon electrode, and attachment is via a nitrogen of an amine group. A representative structure is depicted in Structure 15 of US Patent Application Publication No. 20080248592, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety but particularly for Structures as described therein and the description of different anchor groups and the accompanying text. Again, additional atoms may be present, i.e. linkers and/or terminal groups.

In Structure 16 of US Patent Application Publication No. 20080248592, hereby incorporated by reference as above, the oxygen atom is from the oxide of the metal oxide electrode. The Si atom may also contain other atoms, i.e. be a silicon moiety containing substitution groups. Other attachments for SAMs to other electrodes are known in the art; see for example Napier et al., Langmuir, 1997, for attachment to indium tin oxide electrodes, and also the chemisorption of phosphates to an indium tin oxide electrode (talk by H. Holden Thorpe, CHI conference, May 4-5, 1998).

In one preferred embodiment, indium-tin-oxide (ITO) is used as the electrode, and the anchor groups are phosphonate-containing species.

1). Sulfur Anchor Groups

Although depicted in Structure 1 as a single moiety, the conductive oligomer may be attached to the electrode with more than one “A” moiety; the “A” moieties may be the same or different. Thus, for example, when the electrode is a gold electrode, and “A” is a sulfur atom or moiety, multiple sulfur atoms may be used to attach the conductive oligomer to the electrode, such as is generally depicted below in Structures 2, 3 and 4. As will be appreciated by those in the art, other such structures can be made. In Structures 2, 3 and 4 the A moiety is just a sulfur atom, but substituted sulfur moieties may also be used.

Thus, for example, when the electrode is a gold electrode, and “A” is a sulfur atom or moiety, such as generally depicted below in Structure 6, multiple sulfur atoms may be used to attach the conductive oligomer to the electrode, such as is generally depicted below in Structures 2, 3 and 4. As will be appreciated by those in the art, other such structures can be made. In Structures 2, 3 and 4, the A moiety is just a sulfur atom, but substituted sulfur moieties may also be used.

It should also be noted that similar to Structure 4, it may be possible to have a conductive oligomer terminating in a single carbon atom with three sulfur moieties attached to the electrode.

In another aspect, the present invention provide anchor comprise conjugated thiols. Some exemplary complexes with conjugated thiol anchors are shown in FIG. 10. In some embodiments, the anchor comprises an alkylthiol group. Some of the examples are shown in FIGS. 10A and 4B. The two compounds depicts in FIG. 10B are based on carbene and 4-pyridylalanine, respectively.

In another aspect, the present invention provides conjugated multipodal thio-containing compounds that serve as anchoring groups in the construction of electroactive moieties for analyte detection on electrodes, such as gold electrodes. That is, spacer groups (which can be attached to EAMs, ReAMCs, or an “empty” monolayer forming species) are attached using two or more sulfur atoms. These mulitpodal anchor groups can be linear or cyclic, as described herein.

In some embodiments, the anchor groups are “bipodal”, containing two sulfur atoms that will attach to the gold surface, and linear, although in some cases it can be possible to include systems with other multipodalities (e.g. “tripodal”). Such a multipodal anchoring group display increased stability and/or allow a greater footprint for preparing SAMs from thiol-containing anchors with sterically demanding headgroups.

In some embodiments, the anchor comprises cyclic disulfides (“bipod”). Although in some cases it can be possible to include ring system anchor groups with other multipodalities (e.g. “tripodal”). The number of the atoms of the ring can vary, for example from 5 to 10, and also includes multicyclic anchor groups, as discussed below

In some embodiments, the anchor groups comprise a [1,2,5]-dithiazepane unit which is seven-membered ring with an apex nitrogen atom and a intramolecular disulfide bond as shown below:

In Structure (IIIa), it should also be noted that the carbon atoms of the ring can additionally be substituted. As will be appreciated by those in the art, other membered rings are also included. In addition, multicyclic ring structures can be used, which can include cyclic heteroalkanes such as the [1,2,5]-dithiazepane shown above substituted with other cyclic alkanes (including cyclic heteroalkanes) or aromatic ring structures.

In some embodiments, the anchor group and part of the spacer has the structure shown below

The “R” group herein can be any substitution group, including a conjugated oligophenylethynylene unit with terminal coordinating ligand for the transition metal component of the EAM.

The anchors are synthesized from a bipodal intermediate (I) (the compound as formula III where R═I), which is described in Li et al., Org. Lett. 4:3631-3634 (2002), herein incorporated by reference. See also Wei et al, J. Org, Chem. 69:1461-1469 (2004), herein incorporated by reference.

The number of sulfur atoms can vary as outlined herein, with particular embodiments utilizing one, two, and three per spacer.

As will be appreciated by those in the art, the compositions of the invention can be made in a variety of ways, including those outlined below and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/253,828, filed Oct. 17, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/253,875, filed Oct. 17, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/332,565, filed May 7, 2010; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/347,121, filed May 21, 2010; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/366,013, filed Jul. 20, 2010. In some embodiments, the composition are made according to methods disclosed in of U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,013,459, 6,248,229, 7,018,523, 7,267,939, U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/096,593 and 60/980,733, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/087,102, filed on Aug. 7, 2008, all are herein incorporated in their entireties for all purposes.

Applications

The systems of the invention find use in the detection of a variety of target analytes, as outlined herein. In some embodiments, “sandwich” type assays are used, as are generally depicted in FIGS. 11-13. In other embodiments, for example for the detection of particular metabolites such as ATP and NADH, other formats are used.

In some embodiments, for example in “sandwich” type formats, the target analyte, contained within a test sample, is added to the electrode with the PSM-SIM-EAM mixture, a capture binding ligand, and optionally a SAM. This addition is followed by an optional washing step and the addition of the soluble binding ligand, although as will be appreciated by those in the art, these additions can be done simultaneously or the solution binding ligand can be added to the sample containing the target analyte prior to addition to the chip. The surface is again optionally washed, and the substrate for the peroxide sensitive moiety, e.g. glucose, is added under conditions that if present, peroxide is generated and the SIM is cleaved.

In some embodiments, for example when there is a specific peroxidase-generating enzyme that uses a metabolite of interest (e.g. a target analyte or target metabolite), as depicted in FIGS. 12 and 13, the system takes on different configurations. For example, in FIG. 12, the electrode, generally with a SAM, contains at least two species: (1) an EAM with a self-immolative moiety, depicted in FIG. 12 as a ferrocene-based derivative (although as described herein and as will be appreciated by those in the art, other EAMs can be used); and (2) an attached peroxidase-generating enzyme, in this case, as depicted, NADH oxidase. As outlined herein, the peroxidase-generating enzyme can be attached to the electrode surface in a number of different ways. The attachment can be “direct” when the enzyme is attached to the terminus of a monolayer forming species, as is generally outlined in PCT/US2008/080379, using a coupling chemistry. Alternatively, and as depicted in FIG. 12, the enzyme can be attached using a number of “sandwich” type attachments, for example using a monolayer species with a biotin attached, a streptavidin and a biotin-labeled enzyme.

In some embodiments, these two species can be attached as a single moiety to the electrode surface, for example as generally depicted in Structure 7 of U.S. Pat. No. 7,595,153, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety and specifically for the schematics of attachment configurations.

In some embodiments, metabolites or other target analytes of interest can be detected on the basis of an event, such as an enzymatic event, occurring as the result of the presence of the metabolite or target analyte. For example, ATP can be detected in several ways. In one embodiment, an enzymatic event that relies on the presence of ATP results in some sort of “switch” that then allows detection.

ATP is a multifunctional nucleotide that serves as the energy source for many biological processes in living organisms. Thus, strategies for the detection of ATP have been a central focus for researchers in the fields of clinical diagnostics, microbiology, environmental analyses, and food quality control. To date, numerous ATP sensors have emerged based on colorometric, fluorometric, or electrochemical detection methods. In particular, sensors that employ ATP-dependent enzymatic reactions (i.e., those catalyzed by firefly luciferase, (Kadidate et al., Anal. Chem. 2006 78:337-342 and DNA ligase, Wang et al., Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010 25:2101-2106, both of which are expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety) to generate an output signal are attractive due to their inherent sensitivity and specificity. In one embodiment, ATP electrochemically is detected by exploiting the ATP-dependent biotinylation reaction catalyzed by E. Coli biotin ligase (BirA) at a SAM-modified gold electrode. In another embodiment, ATP is electrochemically detected by exploiting ATP-dependent enzymatic reactions with a SAM-modified gold electrode.

Among the class of enzymes that catalyze the post-translational modification of proteins with biotin, BirA has been shown to site-specifically biotinylate lysine in the 15-amino acid acceptor peptide (AP) sequence (GLNDIFEAQKIEWHE) with kinetics similar to those of the natural protein substrate (see Beckett et al, Protein Sci. 1999 8:921-929, expressly incorporated herein in its entirety). This enzymatic biotinylation reaction proceeds via two steps:

1.) biotin+ATP→biotinyl-5′-AMP+PPi

2.) biotinyl-5′-AMP+AP→biotin-AP+AMP

First, BirA catalyzes the formation of biotinyl-5′-AMP from biotin and ATP. Subsequently, the target lysine residue on the docked peptide/protein substrate is biotinylated through nucleophilic attack on this activated biotin intermediate (Cronan Cell 1989 58:427-429, expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). For example, as depicted in FIG. 12, the electrode is formed with an attached acceptor peptide (AP) that serves as the substrate for the biotin ligase enzyme, as well as an EAM with a self-immolative moiety. A sample containing ATP is added to the electrode in the presence of the biotinylating enzyme and biotin, such that in the presence of ATP, biotin is added to the surface. A streptavidin-oxidase enzyme conjugate is then added, after optionally washing away the non-bound substrates, and then glucose is added, such that the peroxide generating enzyme results in the destruction of the self-immolative linker and a change in the redox potential (E⁰) of the ferrocene moiety.

These conditions are generally physiological conditions. Generally a plurality of assay mixtures is run in parallel with different concentrations to obtain a differential response to the various concentrations. Typically, one of these concentrations serves as a negative control, i.e., at zero concentration or below the level of detection. In addition, any variety of other reagents may be included in the screening assay. These include reagents like salts, neutral proteins, e.g. albumin, detergents, etc which may be used to facilitate optimal binding and/or reduce non-specific or background interactions. Also reagents that otherwise improve the efficiency of the assay, such as protease inhibitors, nuclease inhibitors, anti-microbial agents, etc., may be used. The mixture of components may be added in any order that provides for the requisite binding.

[The generation of peroxidase results in the loss of the PGM-SIM component of the complex, resulting the a change in the E⁰ of the EAM. In some embodiments, the E⁰ of the EAM changes by at about 20 mV, 30 mV, 40 mV, 50 mV, 75 mV, 80 mV, 90 mV to 100 mV, some embodiments resulting in changes of 200, 300 or 500 mV being achieved. In some embodiments, the changes in the E⁰ of the EAM is a decrease. In some embodiments, the changes in the E⁰ of the EAM is an increase.

The determination of solvent reorganization energy will be done as is appreciated by those in the art. Briefly, as outlined in Marcus theory, the electron transfer rates (kET) are determined at a number of different driving forces (or free energy, ΔG°); the point at which the rate equals the free energy is the λ. This may be treated in most cases as the equivalent of the solvent reorganization energy; see Gray et al. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 65:537 (1996), hereby incorporated by reference.

The solvent inhibited redox active molecule, indicating the presence of a target analyte, is detected by initiating electron transfer and detecting a signal characteristic of electron transfer between the solvent inhibited redox active molecule and the electrode.

Electron transfer is generally initiated electronically, with voltage being preferred. A potential is applied to a sample containing modified nucleic acid probes. Precise control and variations in the applied potential can be via a potentiostat and either a three electrode system (one reference, one sample and one counter electrode) or a two electrode system (one sample and one counter electrode). This allows matching of applied potential to peak electron transfer potential of the system which depends in part on the choice of redox active molecules and in part on the conductive oligomer used.

Preferably, initiation and detection is chosen to maximize the relative difference between the solvent reorganization energies of the solvent accessible and solvent inhibited redox active molecules.

Detection

Electron transfer between the redox active molecule and the electrode can be detected in a variety of ways, with electronic detection, including, but not limited to, amperommetry, voltammetry, capacitance and impedance being preferred. These methods include time or frequency dependent methods based on AC or DC currents, pulsed methods, lock in techniques, and filtering (high pass, low pass, band pass). In some embodiments, all that is required is electron transfer detection; in others, the rate of electron transfer may be determined.

In some embodiments, electronic detection is used, including amperommetry, voltammetry, capacitance, and impedance. Suitable techniques include, but are not limited to, electrogravimetry; coulometry (including controlled potential coulometry and constant current coulometry); voltametry (cyclic voltametry, pulse voltametry (normal pulse voltametry, square wave voltametry, differential pulse voltametry, Osteryoung square wave voltametry, and coulostatic pulse techniques); stripping analysis (aniodic stripping analysis, cathiodic stripping analysis, square wave stripping voltammetry); conductance measurements (electrolytic conductance, direct analysis); time dependent electrochemical analyses (chronoamperometry, chronopotentiometry, cyclic chronopotentiometry and amperometry, AC polography, chronogalvametry, and chronocoulometry); AC impedance measurement; capacitance measurement; AC voltametry, and photoelectrochemistry.

In some embodiments, monitoring electron transfer is via amperometric detection. This method of detection involves applying a potential (as compared to a separate reference electrode) between the electrode containing the compositions of the invention and an auxiliary (counter) electrode in the test sample. Electron transfer of differing efficiencies is induced in samples in the presence or absence of target analyte.

The device for measuring electron transfer amperometrically involves sensitive current detection and includes a means of controlling the voltage potential, usually a potentiostat. This voltage is optimized with reference to the potential of the redox active molecule.

In some embodiments, alternative electron detection modes are utilized. For example, potentiometric (or voltammetric) measurements involve non faradaic (no net current flow) processes and are utilized traditionally in pH and other ion detectors. Similar sensors are used to monitor electron transfer between the redox active molecules and the electrode. In addition, other properties of insulators (such as resistance) and of conductors (such as conductivity, impedance and capicitance) could be used to monitor electron transfer between the redox active molecules and the electrode. Finally, any system that generates a current (such as electron transfer) also generates a small magnetic field, which may be monitored in some embodiments.

In some embodiments, the system may be calibrated to determine the amount of solvent accessible redox active molecules on an electrode by running the system in organic solvent prior to the addition of target. This is quite significant to serve as an internal control of the sensor or system. This allows a preliminary measurement, prior to the addition of target, on the same molecules that will be used for detection, rather than rely on a similar but different control system. Thus, the actual molecules that will be used for the detection can be quantified prior to any experiment. Running the system in the absence of water, i.e. in organic solvent such as acetonitrile, will exclude the water and substantially negate any solvent reorganization effects. This will allow a quantification of the actual number of molecules that are on the surface of the electrode. The sample can then be added, an output signal determined, and the ratio of bound/unbound molecules determined. This is a significant advantage over prior methods.

It should be understood that one benefit of the fast rates of electron transfer observed in the compositions of the invention is that time resolution can greatly enhance the signal to noise results of monitors based on electronic current. The fast rates of electron transfer of the present invention result both in high signals and stereotyped delays between electron transfer initiation and completion. By amplifying signals of particular delays, such as through the use of pulsed initiation of electron transfer and “lock in” amplifiers of detection, orders of magnitude improvements in signal to noise may be achieved.

In some embodiments, electron transfer is initiated and detected using direct current (DC) techniques. As noted above, the E⁰ of the redox active molecule can shift as a result of the change in the solvent reorganization energy upon target analyte binding. Thus, measurements taken at the E⁰ of the solvent accessible redox active molecule and at the E⁰ of the solvent inhibited molecule will allow the detection of the analyte. As will be appreciated by those in the art, a number of suitable methods may be used to detect the electron transfer.

In some embodiments, electron transfer is initiated using alternating current (AC) methods. A first input electrical signal is applied to the system, preferably via at least the sample electrode (containing the complexes of the invention) and the counter electrode, to initiate electron transfer between the electrode and the second electron transfer moiety. Three electrode systems may also be used, with the voltage applied to the reference and working electrodes. In this embodiment, the first input signal comprises at least an AC component. The AC component may be of variable amplitude and frequency. Generally, for use in the present methods, the AC amplitude ranges from about 1 mV to about 1.1 V, with from about 10 mV to about 800 mV being preferred, and from about 10 mV to about 500 mV being especially preferred. The AC frequency ranges from about 0.01 Hz to about 10 MHz, with from about 1 Hz to about 1 MHz being preferred, and from about 1 Hz to about 100 kHz being especially preferred

In some embodiments, the first input signal comprises a DC component and an AC component. That is, a DC offset voltage between the sample and counter electrodes is swept through the electrochemical potential of the second electron transfer moiety. The sweep is used to identify the DC voltage at which the maximum response of the system is seen. This is generally at or about the electrochemical potential of the redox active molecule. Once this voltage is determined, either a sweep or one or more uniform DC offset voltages may be used. DC offset voltages of from about 1 V to about +1.1 V are preferred, with from about 500 mV to about +800 mV being especially preferred, and from about 300 mV to about 500 mV being particularly preferred. On top of the DC offset voltage, an AC signal component of variable amplitude and frequency is applied. If the redox active molecule has a low enough solvent reorganization energy to respond to the AC perturbation, an AC current will be produced due to electron transfer between the electrode and the redox active molecule.

In some embodiments, the AC amplitude is varied. Without being bound by theory, it appears that increasing the amplitude increases the driving force. Thus, higher amplitudes, which result in higher overpotentials give faster rates of electron transfer. Thus, generally, the same system gives an improved response (i.e. higher output signals) at any single frequency through the use of higher overpotentials at that frequency. Thus, the amplitude may be increased at high frequencies to increase the rate of electron transfer through the system, resulting in greater sensitivity. In addition, as noted above, it may be possible to distinguish between solvent accessible and solvent inhibited redox active molecules on the basis of the rate of electron transfer, which in turn can be used either to distinguish the two on the basis of frequency or overpotential.

In some embodiments, measurements of the system are taken at least two separate amplitudes or overpotentials, with measurements at a plurality of amplitudes being preferred. As noted above, changes in response as a result of changes in amplitude may form the basis of identification, calibration and quantification of the system.

In some embodiments, the AC frequency is varied. At different frequencies, different molecules respond in different ways. As will be appreciated by those in the art, increasing the frequency generally increases the output current. However, when the frequency is greater than the rate at which electrons may travel between the electrode and the redox active molecules, higher frequencies result in a loss or decrease of output signal. At some point, the frequency will be greater than the rate of electron transfer through even solvent inhibited redox active molecules, and then the output signal will also drop.

In addition, the use of AC techniques allows the significant reduction of background signals at any single frequency due to entities other than the covalently attached nucleic acids, i.e. “locking out” or “filtering” unwanted signals. That is, the frequency response of a charge carrier or redox active molecule in solution will be limited by its diffusion coefficient. Accordingly, at high frequencies, a charge carrier may not diffuse rapidly enough to transfer its charge to the electrode, and/or the charge transfer kinetics may not be fast enough. This is particularly significant in embodiments that do not utilize a passavation layer monolayer or have partial or insufficient monolayers, i.e. where the solvent is accessible to the electrode. As outlined above, in DC techniques, the presence of “holes” where the electrode is accessible to the solvent can result in solvent charge carriers “short circuiting” the system. However, using the present AC techniques, one or more frequencies can be chosen that prevent a frequency response of one or more charge carriers in solution, whether or not a monolayer is present. This is particularly significant since many biological fluids such as blood contain significant amounts of redox active molecules which can interfere with amperometric detection methods.

In some embodiments, measurements of the system are taken at least two separate frequencies, with measurements at a plurality of frequencies being preferred. A plurality of frequencies includes a scan. In a preferred embodiment, the frequency response is determined at least two, preferably at least about five, and more preferably at least about ten frequencies.

Signal Processing

After transmitting the input signal to initiate electron transfer, an output signal is received or detected. The presence and magnitude of the output signal will depend on the overpotential/amplitude of the input signal; the frequency of the input AC signal; the composition of the intervening medium, i.e. the impedance, between the electron transfer moieties; the DC offset; the environment of the system; and the solvent. At a given input signal, the presence and magnitude of the output signal will depend in general on the solvent reorganization energy required to bring about a change in the oxidation state of the metal ion. Thus, upon transmitting the input signal, comprising an AC component and a DC offset, electrons are transferred between the electrode and the redox active molecule, when the solvent reorganization energy is low enough, the frequency is in range, and the amplitude is sufficient, resulting in an output signal.

In some embodiments, the output signal comprises an AC current. As outlined above, the magnitude of the output current will depend on a number of parameters. By varying these parameters, the system may be optimized in a number of ways.

In general, AC currents generated in the present invention range from about 1 femptoamp to about 1 milliamp, with currents from about 50 femptoamps to about 100 microamps being preferred, and from about 1 picoamp to about 1 microamp being especially preferred.

The fraction of the glycolated protein may be determined from the electrochemical properties of the EAM at the first E⁰ and at the second E⁰ (e.g., E^(o) ₁ and E^(o) ₂).

In a general example, determining the fraction of the glycated protein may be as follows: Electrochemical measurement of A1C % is determined through quantification of faradaic current at E^(o) ₁ and E^(o) ₂ from a cyclic voltammogram. A linear baseline is extrapolated from potential where each peak begins to the potential where each peak ends on the voltammogram. Faradaic current is measured for reduction peaks of EAM as a maximum current value minus the baseline current value at that potential (voltage). Faradaic current is measured for oxidation peaks of EAM by taking the minimum current value plus the baseline current at that potential. A ratio of Faradaic current (E^(o) ₂/E^(o) ₁) can be calculated from either the oxidation or reduction waves of the voltammogram as a potential electronic signal. Known calibrators of A1C % introduced into this process produce specific peak ratios that result in a calibration curve. Unknown samples are then tested and the bioelectronic signal that is produced as measured by the peak ratio described above is fitted using the aforementioned calibration curve to ascertain the A1C %.

In one embodiment, electrochemical measurement of A1C % is determined through quantification of faradaic current at E^(o) ₁ and E^(o) ₂ from a cyclic voltammogram. Redox peaks are detected using wavelet transforms to identify the peak and determine a mathematical function that defines the peak. Zero crossings of the derivative of this function define the beginning and end of the peak. A linear baseline is defined based on the beginning and end points of the peak. Faradaic current is measured for reduction peaks of EAM as a maximum current value minus the calculated baseline current value at that potential (voltage). Faradaic current is measured for oxidation peaks of EAM by taking the minimum current value plus the calculated baseline current at that potential. A ratio of Faradaic current (E^(o) ₂/E^(o) ₁) can be calculated from either the oxidation or reduction waves of the voltammogram as a measurement of A1C %.

Apparatus

The present invention further provides apparatus for the detection of analytes using AC detection methods. The apparatus includes a test chamber which has at least a first measuring or sample electrode, and a second measuring or counter electrode. Three electrode systems are also useful. The first and second measuring electrodes are in contact with a test sample receiving region, such that in the presence of a liquid test sample, the two electrodes may be in electrical contact.

In yet another embodiment, the first measuring electrode comprises a redox active complex, covalently attached via a spacer, and preferably via a conductive oligomer, such as are described herein. Alternatively, the first measuring electrode comprises covalently attached redox active molecules and binding ligands.

The apparatus further comprises a voltage source electrically connected to the test chamber; that is, to the measuring electrodes. Preferably, the voltage source is capable of delivering AC and DC voltages, if needed.

In an embodiment, the apparatus further comprises a processor capable of comparing the input signal and the output signal. The processor is coupled to the electrodes and configured to receive an output signal, and thus detect the presence of the target analyte.

EXAMPLES Example 1

General Methods and Materials. Unless otherwise noted, all synthetic manipulations were performed under a dry argon atmosphere using standard Schlenk techniques. For reaction media, solvents were dried over neutral alumina via the Dow-Grubbs solvent system¹ acquired from Glass Contours (Laguna Beach, Calif.). These solvents were deoxygenated with argon prior to use. Reactions were monitored by TLC using EMD precoated aluminum plates (silica gel 60, F₂₅₄, EMD Chemicals, Inc., Gibbstown, N.J.). Spots were visualized by one of the following methods: iodine vapor, exposure to UV light, or staining with phosphomolybdic acid followed by heating. Flash chromatography was carried out on silica (silica gel 60 particle size: 40-63 μm; Sorbent Technologies, Atlanta, Ga.) under a positive pressure of laboratory air. ¹H NMR and proton-decoupled ¹³C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III spectrometer (499.37 MHz for ¹H, 125.58 MHz for ¹³C) and were processed with Bruker TOPSPIN 2.1 software. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) was obtained using an Agilent 6210 time-of-flight (TOF) LC/MS instrument using electrospray ionization (ESI) or atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) methods.

Chloroform-d₁ was purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories. Compound 2 and p-pinacolborate benzyl alcohol were synthesized as described previously (Bertin, P. A.; Meade, T. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 5409-5412; Sella, E.; Shabat, D. Chem. Commun. 2008, 5701-5703, both of which are expressly incorporated by reference). All other reagents were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification unless otherwise noted.

Compound 3.

To a solution of compound 2 (0.500 g, 1.2 mmol) and triethylamine (0.25 mL, 1.8 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran (15 mL) was added diphenylphosphoryl azide (DPPA) (0.285 mL, 1.32 mmol). The reaction was stirred at rt for 1.5 hours and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (methanol:ethyl acetate:dichloromethane 0.5:1.5:8) to yield the title compound as a red/orange solid (0.460 g, 1.04 mmol, 87%). ¹H NMR, ¹³C{¹H} NMR, and HRMS were consistent with the title compound.

Compound 4.

A solution of compound 3 (0.460 g, 1.04 mmol) in toluene (20 mL) was vigorously degassed with Ar and heated to 100° C. for 1.5 hours, p-pinacolborate benzyl alcohol (0.268 g, 1.14 mmol) and dibutyltin-dilaurate (DBTL) (0.018 mL, 0.03 mmol) were added and the reaction maintained at 100° C. for an additional 2 hours. The reaction was concentrated under reduced pressure and the crude residue purified by column chromatography (diethyl ether:ethyl acetate:dichloromethane, 1:2:2) to yield the title compound as a pale orange solid (0.480 g, 0.741 mmol, 71%). ¹H NMR, ¹³C{¹H} NMR, and HRMS were consistent with the title compound.

Compound 5.

A solution of compound 4 (0.135 g, 0.209 mmol) in dichloromethane (5 mL) was cooled in an ice bath. Trifluoroacetic acid:dichloromethane (1:1 v/v, 5 mL) was added dropwise over 5 min. After 15 min, the ice bath was removed and the reaction warmed to room temperature. After 45 min, the volatiles were removed in vacuo to yield the trifluoroacetate salt of the title compound as a brown/orange solid (quantitative). ¹H NMR, ¹³C{¹H} NMR, and HRMS were consistent with the title compound.

Compound 1.

To a solution of 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid (0.045 g, 0.206 mmol) and HATU (0.078 g, 0.206 mmol) in dichloromethane:N,N-dimethylformamide (1:1 v/v, 5 mL) was added compound 5 (0.105 g, 0.159 mmol) and diisopropylethylamine (0.083 mL, 0.477 mmol). The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 2 hours. The reaction mixture was diluted into ethyl acetate (150 mL) and washed with brine (3×50 mL). The organic phase was dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered, and concentrated to crude residue that was purified by column chromatography (methanol:ethyl acetate:dichloromethane, 0.5:1.5:8) to yield the title compound as a yellow solid (0.035 g, 0.047 mmol, 30%). ¹H NMR, ¹³C{¹H} NMR, and HRMS were consistent with the title compound.

Electrochemistry.

Cyclic voltammetry was carried out with a CHI model 660A electrochemical analyzer (CHI Instruments Inc.) in THF with 0.15 M n-Bu₄NClO₄ supporting electrolyte (0.5 mL) using a three electrode system of SAM-modified gold as the working electrode, a Ag/AgCl wire reference electrode, and a platinum wire counter electrode (Bioanalytical Systems). Model compound (green) was prepared by treating compound 4 with hydrogen peroxide. The results are shown in FIG. 3.

Example 2 Measurement of a Quantifiable Electrochemical Signal at Two Unique Potentials, E^(o) ₁ and E^(o) ₂ as a Result of Direct Addition of H₂O₂

Measurement of a quantifiable electrochemical signal at two unique potentials, E^(o) ₁ and E^(o) ₂ as a result of direct addition of H₂O₂: H₂O₂ study on PB25_(—)49 diluted with C6 diluents; 5-minute and 10-minute incubations in Na₂CO₃ buffer (pH 10.1)

A. Purpose

The goal of this study was to test the effect of 5-minute and 10-minute H₂O₂ incubation times on a diluted SAM of EAM 1 (PB25_(—)49) washed at pH 10.1 and incubated at pH 8.5. H₂O₂ would decompose the Ferrocene on the EAM into a new derivative which would show up at a new potential.

B. Materials

MATERIALS BATCH #/Name MW Final C Stock/Solvent NOTES 1. EAM for SAM: PB25_49 MW = 747.57 0.1 mM 0.5 mg/0.5 mL Stock: 0.5 mg EtOH 2. Diluent solutions (C6S)₂ MW = 234.47 0.5 mM — Stock C = 9.13× (4.56 mM stock) for SAM (HO—C6S)₂ MW = 266.47 0.5 mM — Stock C = 7.51× (3.75 mM stock) 3. Electrode testing 1M LiClO₄ MW = 106.39 1M 10.6 g/1 L H₂O Aqueous solution solution: 1X 4. Hydrogen peroxide Hydrogen MW = 34.01  1M 57 μL/943 μL Made fresh peroxide H₂O (50.4%) 5. Buffer Na₂CO₃ MW = 105.99 100 mM 0.53 g/50 mL pH 10.1 H₂O 6. Washing buffers EtOH, — — — — nanopure water, Na₂CO₃, 1M LiClO₄ 7. Electrodes: Reference Counter Working Wash and — electrode electrode Electrode store Quasi 1 Pt Wire Au Chip Rinse before 13 chips reference d = 0.25 and after each (1M LiClO₄) um use Note: All calculations were based on the equation below; Nanopure water was 18 megaohm water from a Millipore purification system. with Molecular Weight (MW or FW) found usually on the product bottles, making sure units are correct. ${{Concentration}\left( {M:\frac{mol}{L}} \right)} = \frac{{Weight}(g)}{{{Volume}(L)} \times {{MolecularWeight}\left( \frac{g}{mol} \right)}}$ EAM 1 structure:

C. Procedure

Day 1:

Wash and Assemble Chips

13 (12 for assay+1 for internal reference testing) chips were washed as follows: the chips were placed in glass jar with inserts, sonicated in 0.2% TWEEN 20 solution for 5 minutes, rinsed with nanopure water and ethanol, and then dried with Argon. The chips were then cleaned in a Plasma Cleaner for 10 minutes, and rinsed with ethanol and dried with Argon. Metal bases, gaskets, and PDMS stamps were hand washed with hand soap, rinsed with ethanol and air dried. Chips were assembled by placing the chip on the double sided tape on center of the metal base, PDMS stamp on the chip, gasket on the PDMS stamp, all clamped together with binder clips.

Prepare Experimental Stocks

EAM stock was prepared by combining the following into the EAM aliquot:

Stocks EAM # Aliquots Amount (mg ea) MW EtOH THF Final Conc. A PB25_49 1 0.5 747.57 500 μL none 1.34 mM

Prepare SAM Solutions

SAM Solution was prepared by combining the following into separate glass vials:

[EAM] AMT [D1] AMT [D2] AMT EtOH mM μL D1 mM μL D2 mM μL μL Tot Vol. μL 1.34 493 (C6S)₂ 4.56 723 (HOC6S)₂ 3.75 879 4505 6600

SAM Incubation

To chips 1-12, 500 μL of above prepared SAM solution was added, followed by overnight incubation. All chips were placed in plastic containers containing ethanol, sealed with parafilm (to avoid ethanol evaporation and drying of chips). The setup was covered with Aluminum foil.

Day 2:

Internal Reference Measurements:

A 1 mM solution of 1 1′ Ferrocene dimethanol was prepared in 1M LiClO₄ solution. 1.3 mg of 1 1′ Ferrocene dimethanol were combined with 5 mL 1M LiClO₄. MW 1 1′ Ferrocene dimethanol=246.09

500 μL of 1 mM 1 1′ Ferrocene dimethanol solution was added to a clean chip. Quasi 1 reference and platinum counter electrodes were added to the system and CVs were recorded.

Initial Testing to Check for Proper SAM Formation on Chips:

After overnight incubation, the chips were removed from the incubation container. The SAM deposition solution was collected in a vial and dried to obtain recycled EAM for future use. After overnight incubation, chips 1 through 12 were washed by following the

Ethanol 8 times Nanopure water 4 times Testing buffer, 1 M LiClO₄ 2 times 500 μL of 1M LiClO₄ was added to chips 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, and 12, and then chip was plugged in the switchbox. Reference and counter electrodes were added to the EC system. The white alligator clip from the CHI 650C was connected to the reference electrode (Quasi 1), green clip to the working electrode and the red clip to the counter electrode (Platinum wire, flamed in advance, rinsed with EtOH and water).

The CHI 650C system was used to test all chips. For each test, six files were used: 10000 mV/s, 100 mV/s, 10000 mV/s long, multi CV (20 cycles) and ACV (forward and backward).

The multiplexer was used for testing all chips in this experiment.

After initial testing, chips 1 through 5 and 7 through 11 were washed as follows:

Nanopure water 8 times 100 mM Na₂CO₃ (pH 10.1) 2 times

Chips 6 and 12 were washed as follows:

Nanopure water 8 times 100 mM NaHCO₃ (pH 8.5) 2 times

Preparation of Different Concentrations of Hydrogen Peroxide:

Different concentrations of H₂O₂ solution were made in 100 mM Na₂CO₃ buffer (pH 10.1) immediately before use. Original stock of H₂O₂ was at 1M which was made by combining 57 μL of 50% H₂O₂ with 943 μL of nanopure water. This stock was left in the 4° C. fridge overnight to allow for muta-rotation. From there on the dilutions were made as shown below:

Final concen- Ratio (previ- Amount of previous Amount Total tration of ous to final concentration of of buffer volume H₂O₂ (mM) concentration) H₂O₂ (μL) (μL) (μL) 1   1:1000 2 1998 2000 0.1 1:10 200 1800 2000 0.01 1:10 200 1800 2000 0.001 1:10 200 1800 2000 0 — 0 2000 2000

Addition of Different Concentrations of H₂O₂ to the Chips and Testing:

The hydrogen peroxide solutions made were vortexed well. 500 μL of the respective hydrogen peroxide solutions was added to each chip (1-12) and the solution was mixed thoroughly. The incubation was carried out at room temperature for 5 minutes, while mixing the solution in between with pipette tips at 4:30, 2:30, and 0:30 times, and for 10 minutes, while mixing the solution in between with pipette tips at 7:30, 5:00, and 2:30 times. After the respective H₂O₂ incubations, the chips were washed as follows:

Nanopure water 8 times 100 mM Na₂CO₃ (pH 10.1) or 2 times 100 mM NaHCO₃ (pH 8.5)

Each well was incubated with 500 μL of their respective buffers for 5 minutes. After the chips were incubated with buffer, the chips were washed as follows:

Nanopure water 8 times 1M LiClO₄ 2 times

The switchbox was used for testing all chips as shown in steps VI d, e and f. After testing, the chips were washed, cleaned with ethanol and water and then disassembled.

Experiment Outline

Chip Chip Name 1 #1_2_H2O2_0μM_5min_pH10pt1 2 #2_2_H2O2_1μM_5min_pH10pt1 3 #3_2_H2O2_10μM_5min_pH10pt1 4 #4_2_H2O2_100μM_5min_pH10pt1 5 #5_2_H2O2_1mM_5min_pH10pt1 6 #6_2_H2O2_0μM_5min_pH8pt5 7 #7_2_H2O2_0μM_10min_pH10pt1 8 #8_2_H2O2_1μM_10min_pH10pt1 9 #9_2_H2O2_10μM_10min_pH10pt1 10 #10_2_H2O2_100μM_10min_pH10pt1 11 #11_2_H2O2_1mM_10min_pH10pt1 12 #11_2_H2O2_0μM_10min_pH8pt5 13 #11_3_post-H2O2_FcMe2

Example 3 H₂O₂ Study on PB25_(—)49

H₂O₂ study on PB25_(—)49 diluted with C6 diluents; 5-minute and 10-minute incubations in NaHCO₃ buffer (pH 8.5) with 100 μM Glucose oxidase (GO_(x))

A. Purpose

The goal of this study was to test the effect of 5-minute and 10-minute glucose incubation times on a diluted SAM of PB25_(—)49 washed at pH 10.1 and incubated at pH 8.5. Glucose oxidase was added at 100 μM to these chips to produce H₂O₂ that would decompose the Ferrocene on the EAM into a new derivative which would show up at a new potential.

B. Materials

MATERIALS BATCH #/Name MW Final C Stock/Solvent NOTES 1. EAM for SAM: PB25_49 MW = 747.57 0.1 mM  0.5 mg/0.5 mL Stock: 0.5 mg EtOH 2. Diluent solutions (C6S)₂ MW = 234.47 0.5 mM — Stock C = 9.13× for SAM (4.56 mM stock) (HO—C6S)₂ MW = 266.47 0.5 mM — Stock C = 7.51× (3.75 mM stock) 3. Electrode testing solution: 1M LiClO₄ MW = 106.39 1M 10.6 g/1 L H₂O Aqueous solution 1X 4. Glucose monohydrate Glucose MW = 180.1 1M 0.99 g/5 mL Muta-rotated water overnight, 4° C. 5. Glucose oxidose GO_(x) MW = 160000 100 μM 12.8 mg/800 μL Made fresh on NaHCO₃ buffer day of use 6. Buffer NaHCO₃ MW = 105.99 100 mM  4.2 g/500 mL pH 8.5 7. Washing buffers EtOH, nanopure — — — — water, NaHCO₃, Na₂CO₃, buffer, 1M LiClO₄ 8. Electrodes: Reference Counter Working Wash and — electrode electrode Electrode store Quasi 1 reference Pt Wire Au Chip Rinse before and 11 green chips (1M LiClO₄) d = 0.25 after each use um Note: All calculations were based on the equation above, with Molecular Weight (MW or FW) found usually on the product bottles, making sure units are correct. ${{Concentration}\left( {M:\frac{mol}{L}} \right)} = \frac{{Weight}(g)}{{{Volume}(L)} \times {{MolecularWeight}\left( \frac{g}{mol} \right)}}$ EAM structure is as shown:

C. Procedure

Day 1:

Wash and Assemble Chips

11 (10 for assay+1 for internal reference testing) green chips were washed as follows: the chips were placed in glass jar with inserts, sonicated in 0.2% TWEEN 20 solution for 5 minutes, rinsed with nanopure water and ethanol, and then dried with Argon. The chips were then cleaned in a Plasma Cleaner for 10 minutes, and rinsed with ethanol and dried with Argon. Metal bases, gaskets, and PDMS stamps were hand washed with hand soap, rinsed with ethanol and air dried. Chips were assembled by placing the chip on the double sided tape on center of the metal base, PDMS stamp on the chip, gasket on the PDMS stamp, all clamped together with binder clips.

Prepare Experimental Stocks

EAM stock was prepared by combining the following into the EAM aliquot:

Stocks EAM # Aliquots Amount (mg ea) MW EtOH THF Final Conc. A PB25_49 1 0.5 747.57 500 μL none 1.34 mM

Prepare SAM Solutions

SAM Solution was prepared by combining the following into separate glass vials:

[EAM] AMT [D1] AMT [D2] mM μL D1 mM μL D2 mM AMT μL EtOH μL Tot Vol. μL 1.34 411 (C11S)₂ 2.67 1030 (HOC11S)₂ 2.46 1119 2940 5500

SAM Incubation

To chips 1-10, 500 μL of above prepared SAM solution was added, followed by overnight incubation. All chips were placed in plastic containers containing ethanol, sealed with parafilm (to avoid ethanol evaporation and drying of chips). The setup was covered with Aluminum foil.

Day 2:

Internal Reference Measurements:

A 1 mM solution of 1 1′ Ferrocene dimethanol was prepared in 1M LiClO₄ solution. 1.3 mg of 1 1′ Ferrocene dimethanol were combined with 5 mL 1M LiClO₄. MW 1 1′ Ferrocene dimethanol=246.09. 500 μL of 1 mM 1 1′ Ferrocene dimethanol solution was added to a clean chip. Quasi 1 reference and platinum counter electrodes were added to the system and CVs were recorded.

Initial Testing to Check for Proper SAM Formation on Chips:

After overnight incubation, the chips were removed from the incubation container. The SAM deposition solution was collected in a vial and dried to obtain recycled EAM for future use. After overnight incubation, chips 1 through 10 were washed by following the steps shown below:

Ethanol 8 times Nanopure water 4 times Testing buffer, 1M LiClO₄ 2 times

500 μL of 1M LiClO₄ was added to chips 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, and 10, and then chip was plugged in the switchbox.

Reference and counter electrodes were added to the EC system. The white alligator clip from the CHI 650C was connected to the reference electrode (Quasi 1), green clip to the working electrode and the red clip to the counter electrode (Platinum wire, flamed in advance, rinsed with EtOH and water).

The CHI 650C system was used to test all chips. For each test, six files were used: 10000 mV/s, 100 mV/s, 10000 mV/s long, multi CV (20 cycles) and ACV (forward and backward).

The multiplexer was used for testing all chips in this experiment. After initial testing, chips 1 through 10 were washed as follows:

Nanopure water 8 times 100 mM NaHCO₃ 2 times

Preparation of Different Concentrations of Glucose:

A 100 μM Stock of GO_(x) was made by combining 12.8 mg of GO_(x) with 800 μL of NaHCO₃ buffer, immediately before use.

Different concentrations of glucose solution were made in 100 mM NaHCO₃ buffer (pH 8.5) immediately before use. Original stock of glucose was at 1M which was made by combining 0.99 g of Glucose with 5 mL nanopure water. This stock was left in the 4° C. fridge overnight to allow for muta-rotation. From there on the dilutions were made as shown below:

Final concen- Ratio (previ- Amount of previ- Amount Total tration of ous to final ous concentration of volume Glucose (mM) concentration) of Glucose (μL) buffer (μL) (μL) 1  1:1000 2 1998 2000 0.1 1:10 200 1800 2000 0.01 1:10 200 1800 2000 0.001 1:10 200 1800 2000 0 — 0 2000 2000

Addition of Different Concentrations of Glucose to the Chips and Testing:

The glucose solutions made were vortexed well and 450 μL were added to the respective chips. 50 μL of 100 μM Glucose oxidase was added to each chip (1-10) and the solution was mixed thoroughly. The incubation was carried out at room temperature for 5 minutes, while mixing the solution in between with pipette tips at 4:30, 2:30, and 0:30 times, and for 10 minutes, while mixing the solution in between with pipette tips at 7:30, 5:00, and 2:30 times.

After the respective glucose incubations, the chips were washed as follows:

Nanopure water 8 times Na₂CO₃, pH 10.1 2 times

Each well was incubated with 500 μL of Na₂CO₃, (pH 10.1) buffer for 5 minutes.

After the chips were incubated with buffer, the chips were washed as follows:

Nanopure water 8 times 1M LiClO₄ 2 times

The switchbox was used for testing all chips as shown in steps VI d, e and f. After testing, the chips were washed, cleaned with ethanol and water and then disassembled.

Experiment Outline

Chip Chip Name 1 #1_2_glucose_0mM_5min 2 #2_2_glucose_1μM_5min 3 #3_2_glucose_10μM_5min 4 #4_2_glucose_100μM_5min 5 #5_2_glucose_1mM_5min 6 #6_2_glucose_0mM_10min 7 #7_2_glucose_1μM_10min 8 #8_2_glucose_10μM_10min 9 #9_2_glucose_100μM_10min 10 #10_2_glucose_1mM_10min 11 #11_3_post-glucose_FcMe2

Example 4 Testing PB25_(—)49 on Chips with Troponin A. Purpose

The goal of this study was to determine the electrochemistry of the EAM PB25_(—)49 on green chips after creating a troponin antibody sandwich and glucose addition resulting in H₂O₂ generation due to secondary antibody GO_(x) labeling.

B. Materials

MATERIALS BATCH #/Name MW ES Conc Stock/Solvent NOTES 1. SAM EAM: PB25_49 747.57 0.1 mM 0.5 mg/0.5 mL EtOH Prepared Previously 2. SAM Diluent (OH—C11—S)₂ 406.72 0.5 mM 1 mg/mL Prepared Previously II (C11S)₂ 374.72 0.5 mM 5 Mm Prepared Previously HS—C₁₆—COOH 288.49 0.001 mM 0.5 mg 3. Incubation PBS — — — — Buffer 4. Testing 1M LiClO₄ 106.39 1M 10.6 g/L H₂O Prepared solution: Previously 5. Washing EtOH, — — — buffers nanopure water, 1M LiClO₄, PBS 6. Electrodes: Reference Counter Working Wash and store — Quasi 4 Pt Wire Au Chip Rinse before and 10 Green (1M LiClO₄) d = 0.25 μm after each use

C. Procedure

Day 1:

Prepare SAM Solution

The following Experimental Stocks were prepared by combining the stock material to the corresponding solvents and additives. EAM: one 0.5 mg PB25_(—)49 aliquots, added 500 μL of EtOH; pre-made 1 mg/mL stock of Bis(11-hydroxyundecyl)disulfide (HO—C11-S)₂, pre-made 1 mg/mL stock of Diundecyl disulfide, (C11-S)₂; added 500 μL to 0.5 mg aliquot of HS—C16-COOH.

The SAM solution was prepared by combining the following in a 20 mL glass vial: 411 μL of 1.34 mM ES (estimated stock concentration) for final concentration of 0.1 mM of PB25_(—)49; 1.118 mL of 2.46 mM ES for final concentration of 0.5 mM of (OH—C11-S)₂; 1.030 mL of 2.67 mM for final concentration of 0.5 mM of (C11-S)₂: 0.002 mL of 3.47 mM ES for a final concentration of 0.001 mM of HS—C16-COOH; and 2.940 mL for a total volume of 5.5 mL of ethanol (EtOH).

SAM Deposition

For all chips, the following procedure was performed to deposit the SAM: the chips were placed in slotted microscope-slide jar with exposed gold surfaces facing inwards, pre-made 0.2% Tween 20 was added to the jar until the chips were completely submerged; the chips were thoroughly rinsed with nanopure water after sonicating, and each chip was rinsed with EtOH and dried with argon gas. The chips were then plasma cleaned for 10 minutes at the “low” plasma setting, and the chips were again rinsed with EtOH and dried with argon. Accessory parts (base, gasket, tub) were cleaned by scrubbing with hand soap, rinsing with deionized water and nanopure water, rinsed with EtOH, and air-drying. Chips were assembled, then leak tested with EtOH to ensure the gasket was producing a good seal. 500 μL of the deposition solution prepared above was added to the tub in each chip, and chips were incubated overnight at in a sealed and covered glass container.

Day 2:

Initial Testing to Verify Proper SAM Formation

Following overnight incubation, chips removed from containers, and washed with 2× ethanol, 6× nanopure water, and 2×LiClO₄. 500 μL testing solution (see table above) was added in each tub, and the electrodes (see table above) were connected to the CHI system (the Pt counter was cleaned with a propane torch and EtOH rinse prior to use). Cyclic voltammetry was performed between ranges determined during testing with 10000 mV/s CV, 100 mV/s CV, for all chips.

EDC, NHS Activation

The Chips were washed 4× with nanopure water before addition of any further solutions. 1000 μL of EDC was added to 1000 μL of NHS; and 200 μL of this mixed solution was added to 4 chips, and incubated for 30 minutes (All incubations were done in empty pipette tip containers and covered with foil to minimize light exposure.) The chips were washed with 4× with nanopure water after incubation.

Streptavidin

200 μμL of streptavidin solution was added and incubated for 1 hour, washed with 4×PBS and 1×LiClO₄. Chips Nos. 3-6 were tested as in 3.5.1. NOTE: only the chips that were tested were washed with LiClO₄. All chips that were tested were washed again 4×PBS. This applies to all steps below.

Chip Material 1 Gox-Biotin 2 Gox-Biotin 3 Tested after each step 4 Tested after each step 5 Tested after each step 6 Tested after each step 7 Tested only immediately before glucose 8 Tested only immediately before glucose 9 Only tested after addition of glucose 10 Only tested after addition of glucose

Ethanolamine Capping

200 μμL ethanolamine was added to each chip, and the chips were incubate for 15 minutes, and washed 4×PBS.

BSA Blocking

0.1% BSA was added, incubated 10 minutes, and washed with 4×PBS and 1×LiClO₄, and chips 3-6 were tested as in 3.5.1.

GO_(x) and Primary Antibody Addition

Concentration of GO_(x)-biotin stock was 1 mg/mL, and 4 μμL of GO_(x)-biotin stock was added to 396 μμL of PBS. 200 μL of 10 μg/mL GO_(x)-biotin was added to Chip Nos. 1-2, incubated for 1 hour. Stock of mAb 19C7-biotin was at 1.7 mg/mL, and 8 μL of mAb 19C7-biotin was added to 792 μL of PBS for a concentration of 17 μg/mL. 100 μL of antibody-biotin to was added to Chip Nos. 3-10. Both solutions were left to incubate for 45 minutes, and chips Nos. 3-6 were washed with 4×PBS and 1×LiClO₄ and tested.

Troponin and Secondary Antibody Incubation

The troponin aliquot (1 mg/mL) was taken from the −20° C. freezer and let thaw, and 1 μL was added to 9 μL of PBS to yield 100 μg/mL. 1 μL of this stock was added to 48 μL of PBS. 1 μL of mAb16A11-Gox (1.7 mg/mL) was also added to the PBS/troponin solution, vortexed, incubated for 30 mins.

Gox-Biotin Testing

Chips Nos. 1 and 2 were washed 4×PBS and 1×LiClO₄, tested, and subsequently washed 4×PBS. A 2 mM Glucose solution was prepared by taking 20 μL of 1M to 9980 μL of NaHCO₃ (pH 8.5), and 500 μL of this solution was added to chips and incubated for 10 minutes. Chips Nos. 1 and 2 were then washed 4×PBS and 1×LiClO₄, and tested. Chips were then washed 4×PBS, incubated with 100 mM H₂O₂ for 2 minutes, and then washed and tested.

Troponin and Secondary Antibody Addition

Chips 3-10 were washed 4×PBS. The 50 μL incubation of troponin and mAb16A11-Gox was diluted up to 1.2 mL in PBS, the solution was vortexed, 150 μL of this stock was added to chips Nos. 3-10 and incubated for 30 minutes.

Troponin and Secondary Antibody Testing.

Chips Nos. 3-10 were washed 4×PBS. Chips Nos. 5-8 were washed 1× tested, and washed with 4×PBS. 500 μL of 100 mM H₂O₂ was added to Chips Nos. 6-7 for 2 minutes, and after incubation the chips were washed 4×PBS and 1×LiClO₄ and tested. 2 mM glucose was added to Chip Nos. 9-10 for 20 minutes, and after incubation the chips were washed 4×PBS and 1×LiClO₄ and tested.

Monolayer Preparation.

Gold-evaporated electrodes were cleaned with a 5 minute sonication in 0.2% Tween 20 solution, washed with ethanol before undergoing 10 minutes of plasma ionization. The electrodes were then washed with ethanol before being exposed to the deposition solution. The deposition solution was composed of Compound 1 (0.1 mM), dihexyl disulfide (0.5 mM (C6-S)2) and bis(6-hydroxyhexyl)disulfide (0.5 mM (HO—C6-S)₂) and 16-mercaptohexadecanoic acid (0.01 mM, MHA). The deposition solution was incubated on the gold electrodes overnight for ˜18 hours. The deposition solution was then removed and the electrodes were washed with ethanol followed by water. The MHA was activated for 30 minutes using a 1/1 volume/volume of N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) (0.1 M) and 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) (0.4 M). Following this activation the electrodes were washed with water and incubated 1 hour with streptavidin (0.05 mg/mL) in 10 mM sodium acetate pH 5.7. The electrodes were washed with PBS between each step for the remaining steps of the assay. Ethanolamine (0.1 mM NaHCO₃) was added to cap the unreacted MHA sites for 15 minutes. BSA (0.1 weight %) in PBS buffer was added for 10 minutes to reduce nonspecific binding. The primary antibody (mAb-19c7-biotin, HyTest) was added at a concentration of 17 μg/mL and incubated for 45 minutes. During this time, the secondary antibody (34 μg/mL, mAb-16A11-GOx, Hytest) was incubated with Human cardiac troponin I (2 μg/mL). The secondary antibody-troponin complex was then added to the electrodes at concentration of interest and incubated for 30 minutes. At this point the full “sandwich” is built up on the MHA in the monolayer. Glucose (2 mM) was then incubated for 10 minutes, solution was removed, electrodes were washed with PBS and the cyclic voltammograms were recorded in LiClO₄ (1 M).

Example 5 ATP Detection

ATP can be electrochemically detected by exploiting the ATP-dependent enzymatic reactions with a SAM-modified gold electrode by using the activities of glycerol kinase (GK) and glycerol-3-phosphate oxidase (G3PO) if the co-substrate glycerol is present in the reaction mixture (see Murphy, L. J. et al. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 4345-4353; and Llaudet, E. et al., Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 3267-3273). The enzymatic steps proceed as follows:

1.) glycerol+ATP+GK→glycerol-3-phosphate+ADP

2.) glycerol-3-phosphate+G3PO+O₂→glycerone phosphate+H₂O₂

First, GK catalyzes the formation of glycerol-3-phosphate from glycerol and ATP. Subsequently, G3PO oxidizes glycerol-3-phosphate to yield glycerone phosphate and hydrogen peroxide. Thus, the amount of peroxide produced is directly linked to the amount of ATP in the sample if glycerol is in excess. An approach toward the electrochemical detection of peroxide produced from this enzymatic reaction sequence is shown in FIG. 14.

The ATP sensor is based on a SAM-modified gold electrode that contains peroxide-reactive electroactive molecules (EAMs). The initial apparent formal potential of EAMs in the monolayer characterizes the sensor “off” state. Upon exposure to an ATP-containing sample matrix, hydrogen peroxide production triggers an irreversible elimination reaction in the immobilized EAMs resulting in a signal “on” change in apparent formal potential of ferrocene groups that is detected electrochemically. This enzyme-triggered redox altering chemical elimination (E-TRACE) reaction for a representative class of ferrocene EAMs is shown in FIG. 15. (see e.g. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/853,204).

Electrochemical data for ATP detection using the assay described above was collected using cyclic voltammetry (CV). Initial monolayers of the peroxide-reactive ferrocene probe showed a reversible redox wave with an E^(0′)=60 mV and an average faradaic peak current i=1.6 uA (1M LiClO₄, vs AgQRE, Pt counter, 10V/s). Exposure of the electrodes to 1 mM ATP in a buffer containing 2 mM glycerol, 1.33 U/mL of GK and G3PO (10 mM PBS, pH=8.5, 1 mM MgCl₂) for 10 min followed by a 2 min wash (pH=10) resulted in the appearance of a second low potential redox wave E^(0′)=−220 mV with i=0.1 uA (FIG. 16). This signal for 1 mM ATP is twice that recorded for the same electrode treatment without ATP (i=0.04 uA). As a positive control, 1 mM H₂O₂ was spiked into the same buffer without ATP (i=0.59 uA at E^(0′)=−220 mV). The weaker signal for 1 mM ATP compared to the positive control may be attributed to insufficient reaction time.

Example 6 HbA1c: General Detection Method

A Single Measurement for A1c Detection (S-MAD) can be performed according to the methods described herein by an electrochemical measurement using the enzyme-triggered redox altering chemical elimination (E-TRACE) reaction.

As shown in FIG. 11, a SAM is prepared on a gold electrode that contains a peroxide-sensitive ferrocene EAM, diluent molecules to reduce non-specific binding of proteins, and a group for conjugating anti-hemoglobin antibodies for non-preferentially immobilizing hemoglobin, (i.e. glycated or not). In particular, the anti-total hemoglobin antibody could be immobilized on the SAM through covalent binding using well-established cross linking methodology e.g., conjugated via biotin/streptavidin interactions. It would also be possible to use a different method for initial capture by molecular probe binding to the heme group or utilizing a protein-protein interaction (e.g., haptoglobin-hemoglobin).

The SAM is exposed to the sample matrix (lysed whole blood) and washed extensively. To determine the proportion of glycated hemoglobin present in the sample, the electrode is then exposed to a GOx-conjugated secondary anti-A1c antibody that binds to the glycated site of the hemoglobin creating an antibody “sandwich” with immobilized hemoglobin A1c only, not non-glycated hemoglobin (FIG. 17). The surface is washed extensively and treated with an oxygen-saturated buffer containing an excess of glucose. The GOx on the SAM catalyzes the reaction of glucose and oxygen to gluconic acid and hydrogen peroxide, can result in the enzymatic amplification of hydrogen peroxide in solution which diffuses to the monolayer surface and trigger a chemical elimination reaction in the immobilized EAMs. This irreversible elimination reaction changes the electronic environment of the ferrocene groups and shift the apparent formal potential producing a concentration dependent signal of hemoglobin A1c.

Results from an optical detection scheme, analogous to the electrochemical set-up seen in FIG. 17 above, suggest that for a fixed, total hemoglobin concentration the ratio of the surface bound species (A1c to total hemoglobin) could potentially represent the ratio of the species in solution (A1c to total hemoglobin) and that a dose response can be achieved.

Further optimization of the capture antibody density on the surface may improve the performance of the sensor. The data in FIG. 19 shows the response of varying percentages of A1c to three different concentrations of capture antibody in coating solution. A1c samples were in the clinically relevant range (4-12%) at physiologic concentrations of total hemoglobin, 1.48-1.98 mM.

FIGS. 18 and 19 show that a total hemoglobin capture antibody, coupled with an A1c-specific enzyme reporter tagged secondary antibody can provide a differential signal, dependant upon the proportion of A1c immobilized on the surface.

FIG. 20 demonstrates a kinetic result obtained for a fixed ratio of A1c and different total hemoglobin concentration. A negligible difference in signal is seen between the different dilutions providing evidence that the assay can provide the same result at different total hemoglobin concentrations with a fixed A1c %. Further evidence is being collected to support the preliminary data that the output signal for any A1c % is constant across the clinical range of total hemoglobin, 11-18 g/dL (1.6-2.7 mM). The assay need only perform without a bias over the relatively narrow clinical range of total hemoglobin concentration or a dilution of that range.

This single-measurement detection of A1c coupled to an electro-active SAM provides a less complex means for determining the proportion of A1c to total hemoglobin in a sample. It offers the advantages of not needing to perform two measurements, as well as eliminating optical measurements, multiple antibody pairs, or percentage calculation algorithms, that introduces further error, based on two separate measurements for A1c and total hemoglobin. The assay can be calibrated to provide A1c % from a single measurement in samples with differing total hemoglobin concentration.

Example 7 Measurement of a Quantifiable Electrochemical Signal at Two Unique Potentials, Eo1 and Eo2. as a Result of the Presence of H₂O₂

Experimental description for measurement of a quantifiable electrochemical signal at two unique potentials, E^(o) ₁ and E^(o) ₂. as a result of the presence of H₂O₂ due to the detection of percentage of A1c in solution or samples.

Solution calculations are based on a 10-total tube assay: 3 calibrants (5%, 1%) and 2 clinical samples (5%, 1%).

Preparation of Stocks

45 ng/μL secondary antibody solution (110 μL) was prepared from 3.03 mg/mL stock of 1.63 μL of Biotin-anti-A1c (stock 3.03 mg/mL) mixed with 108.4 μL Binding Buffer. 90 ng/μL SA-AP enzyme solution (110 μL) was prepared from 6.6 μL of Streptavidin-AP stock (stock 1.5 mg/mL; Calbiochem) mixed with 103.4 μL Binding Buffer. 2 μM FADP substrate solution (total 1700 μL) was prepared from 34 μL of 100 μM FADP mixed with 1666 μL [833*2] Tris buffer (pH 8.5) (100 μM FADP was prepared from 1 μL of 10 mM FADP+99 μL Tris buffer (pH 8.5)). Amplification stocks (140 μL each) were also prepared: i) 60 μM DAAO was obtained from 42 μL of stock 200 μM DAAO mixed with 118 μL Tris pH8.5; and ii) 420 mM D-proline was obtained from 58.8 μL of stock 1M D-proline mixed with 81.2 μL Tris pH 8.5.

Preparation of Magnetic Beads

Magnetic beads with capture antibody are pre-washed and pre-blocked. Vortex bead stocks to mix thoroughly. 0.1 μg/μL bead solution (1050 μL) was created by mixing 10.5 μL of 10 μg/μL M280 bead stock with 1039.5 μL [519.5*2] Binding Buffer. 100 μL of 0.1 μg/μL bead solution was added into each aliquot to a final concentration of 10 μg/tube; 1 tube

3 E-TRACE wells. After addition of beads, beads were pelleted against magnetic bar and supernatant was removed.

Target Binding

Target dilution series were prepared as follows:

Bio-Rad Label % A1c Level 1 2.70% Level 2 5.50% Level 3 10.8% Level 4 19.8% 5% dilutions of each calibrant/sample were created by mixing 7 μL of 100% target and 133 μL of Binding Buffer to 140 μL total. 1% dilutions of each calibrant/sample were created by mixing 22 μL of 5% target and 88 μL of Binding Buffer to 110 μL total. 100 μL each of target was added to their appropriate tubes containing magnetic beads, in 30 second intervals, shook by hand and incubate for 5 minutes.

Washing of Beads

Tubes were then added to magnet in 30 second intervals, in order of addition, immediately followed by addition of 200 μL of Wash Buffer. The supernatant was removed and 500 μL of Wash Buffer was added. After all tubes were on the magnet, the supernatant was removed and 700 μL of Wash Buffer was added, followed by rotation of tubes by 90° and back.

Addition of Secondary Antibody

Supernatant was removed from aliquots and tubes were removed from magnet, and 10 μL of secondary antibody solution was added to each tube, in 30 second intervals. The samples were shook by hand and incubated for 2 minutes, and the beads were washed as noted above.

Enzyme Conjugation

Supernatant was removed from aliquots and tubes were removed from magnet, and 10 μL of streptavidin-AP solution was added to each tube, in 30 second intervals, shook by hand and incubated for 2 minutes. The Beads were washed as noted above with two additional washes with 800 μL and with 900 μL of Wash Buffer. About 400 μL of supernatant was removed; the tubes were removed from magnet and shook by hand to resuspend beads; and the beads were then transfer to new set of tubes. The supernatant was removed and 900 μL of TBS (pH 8.5) was then added.

Substrate Addition

Supernatant was removed from aliquots and tubes were removed from magnet, and 140 μL of 2 μM FADP was added to each tube in 30 second intervals, and incubated for 90 seconds. After FADP incubation, beads were pelleted against magnet bar in 30 second intervals. After a tube has been on the magnet for 30 seconds, FAD+product solution (130 μL) was removed to one set of tubes. The beads were washed as noted above and also with 800 μL of TBS pH8.5. Aliquots were then removed from magnet and 100 μL of PNPP (para-nitrophenylphosphate) solution is added to each tube, in quick succession. The samples are shook by hand and incubated on the shaker at room temperature at 300 rpm.

Optical Measurement of HbA1c Via PNPP

After PNPP incubation for 40 minutes, the magnetic beads were pelleted and 95 μL was removed and transfer into 96-well ELISA plate. ELISA plate absorbance was read at 405 nm.

Enzyme Amplification

Enzyme amplification mixture was prepared as follows: 133.9 μL of 60 μM DAAO, 133.9 μL of 420 mM D-Proline, and 229.7 μL of 400 mM Na₂CO₃. To 130 μL of FAD+ solution, 48.33 μL (13 μL+13 μL+22.3 μL) of DAAO/proline/Na₂CO₃ mixture was added in 30 sec intervals (final concentrations are about 35 mM of D-proline, and about 5 μM of DAAO, based on final volume). The mixture was vortex lightly and added onto chip after 30 seconds addition of enzyme solution.

E-TRACE Testing of Hydrogen Peroxide

6-well chips were prepared with SAM of 0.1 mM Ferrocene EAM and 0.25 mM PEG₃-C₁₁SH one day before. Chips were washed with ethanol (8×) and Nanopure water (4×). 50 μL of the appropriate H₂O₂-generating solution was added to their respective chips for 10 minutes, and the chips were then washed with ethanol (4×) and Nanopure water (2×). Approximately 150 μL of 1M LiClO₄ was added to the chips and then chips were plugged into the CHI 650C system. Reference and counter electrodes were added to the EC system

Experimental Outline

Tube Sample Tube Sample 1 Lvl 1: 5% 6 Lvl 1: 1% 2 Lvl 2: 5% 7 Lvl 2: 1% 3 Lvl 3: 5% 8 Lvl 3: 1% 4 Sample 1: 5% 9 Sample 1: 1% 5 Sample 2: 5% 10 Sample 2: 1%

It is to be understood that the examples and embodiments described herein are for illustrative purposes only. Unless clearly excluded by the context, all embodiments disclosed for one aspect of the invention can be combined with embodiments disclosed for other aspects of the invention, in any suitable combination. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the present invention without departing from the scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents. 

We claim:
 1. A single, direct measurement method for measuring the fraction of a protein that is a glycated protein in a test sample comprising said protein and said glycated protein, said method comprising: (a) contacting a first binding ligand with said test sample under conditions wherein said first binding ligand binds selectively and equivalently to said protein and said glycated protein in direct proportion to the fraction of said glycated protein in said test sample to form a first complex; (b) contacting said sample containing first complex, with a second binding ligand under conditions wherein said first complex and said second binding ligand bind to form a second complex, wherein said second binding ligand comprising a peroxide-generating system and wherein said second binding ligand binds specifically to said glycated protein of said first complex; (c) isolating said second complex; (d) contacting said second complex with a substrate for said peroxide-generating system under conditions wherein a peroxide is generated to form an assay mixture; (e) contacting the assay mixture with a first solid support comprising an electrode comprising a covalently attached electroactive moiety (EAM) having a first E⁰, said EAM comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety (SIM) and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM), wherein said peroxide reacts with said PSM to release said SIM from said EAM and result in said EAM having a second E⁰; (f) measuring the electrochemical properties of said EAM at the first E⁰ and at the second E⁰; and (g) determining the fraction of said glycated protein from said electrochemical properties.
 2. A single, direct measurement method for measuring the fraction of a protein that is a glycated protein in a test sample comprising said protein and said glycated protein, said method comprising: (a) contacting a first binding ligand comprising a peroxide-generating system with a test sample under conditions wherein first binding ligand binds specifically to said glycated protein to form a first complex; (b) contacting said sample containing first complex, with a second binding ligand under conditions wherein said second binding ligand binds selectively and equivalently to said protein and said glycated protein of said first complex in direct proportion to the fraction of said glycated protein in said test sample to form a second complex; (c) isolating said second complex; (d) contacting said second complex with a substrate for said peroxide-generating system under conditions wherein a peroxide is generated to form an assay mixture; (e) contacting the assay mixture with a first solid support comprising an electrode comprising a covalently attached electroactive moiety (EAM) having a first E⁰, said EAM comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety (SIM) and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM), wherein said peroxide reacts with said PSM to release said SIM from said EAM and result in said EAM having a second E⁰; (f) measuring the electrochemical properties of said EAM at the first E⁰ and at the second E⁰; and (g) determining the fraction of said glycated protein from said electrochemical properties
 3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said electrode further comprises a self-assembled monolayer (SAM).
 4. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said first binding ligand is attached to a second solid support.
 5. A method according to claim 4, wherein said second solid support is chosen from the group consisting of microparticles, magnetic microparticles, beads, and microchannels.
 6. A method according to claim 2, wherein said second binding ligand is attached to a second solid support.
 7. A method according to claim 6, wherein said second solid support is chosen from the group consisting of microparticles, magnetic microparticles, beads, and microchannels.
 8. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said peroxide-generating system is an oxidase enzyme.
 9. The method according to claim 8, wherein said oxidase enzyme is selected from the group consisting of glucose oxidase, glucose oxidase, acyl CoA oxidases, alcohol oxidases, aldehyde oxidases, D-amino acid oxidase (DAAO), choline oxidase, and acyl CoA oxidases.
 10. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said peroxide-generating system is an intermediary enzyme component of a peroxide generating system, such as alkaline phosphatase or any other phosphatase.
 11. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said first binding ligand and said second binding ligand are independently chosen from the group consisting of monoclonal antibodies, fragments of monoclonal antibodies, polyclonal antibodies, fragments of polyclonal antibodies, proteins, and peptides.
 12. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said EAM comprises a transition metal.
 13. A method according to claim 12, wherein said transition metal is chosen from the group consisting of iron, ruthenium and osmium.
 14. A method according to claim 12, wherein said EAM is chosen from the group consisting of ferrocene and substituted ferrocene.
 15. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said protein is hemoglobin and said glycated protein is glycated hemoglobin.
 16. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said protein is hemoglobin and said glycated protein is hemoglobin A1c.
 17. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said glycated protein is glycated serum protein, fructosamine and glycated albumin.
 18. A composition comprising: (a) a first solid support comprising (i) a covalently attached electroactive active moiety (EAM) comprising a transition metal complex comprising a self-immolative moiety (SIM) and a peroxide sensitive moiety (PSM), wherein said EAM has a first E^(o) when said SIM is covalently attached to said EAM and a second E^(o) when said SIM is absent; (ii) optional self-assembled monolayer (SAM); (b) a first binding ligand that binds selectively and equivalently to a protein and a glycated protein in direct proportion to the fraction of glycated protein in a test sample; (c) a second binding ligand that specifically binds to said glycated protein, said second binding ligand comprising a peroxide-generating system and optionally bound to a second solid support; and (d) optional substrate for said peroxide-generating system. 